From: H. Peter Anvin on
On 02/12/2010 11:13 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_X86_64
> + "i" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
> +#else
> + "r" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
> #endif
> + : "memory", "cc");

Using an "er" constraint here should work on both architectures.

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Avi Kivity on
On 02/13/2010 10:16 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/12/2010 11:13 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_X86_64
>> + "i" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
>> +#else
>> + "r" (-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
>> #endif
>> + : "memory", "cc");
>>
> Using an "er" constraint here should work on both architectures.
>
>

Right. v2 to follow.

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/