From: Cyrill Gorcunov on
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:48:52PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Please review, I didn't manage to test (emulate actually since I don't
> have such a hardware) it yet (going to do so this weekend).
>
> Meanwhile I would like to heard comments, complains and etc...
> Perhaps I miss something obvious so don't hesitate to poke me.
>
> -- Cyrill
> ---
> x86,io-apic: Do not map IO-APIC direct registers twice
>
....
I know that I've occasionally removed

apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "mapped IOAPIC
to %08lx (%08lx)\n",

already fixed in v2, just do not post updated version here.

-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Cyrill Gorcunov on
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:54:59PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:48:52PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > Please review, I didn't manage to test (emulate actually since I don't
> > have such a hardware) it yet (going to do so this weekend).
> >
> > Meanwhile I would like to heard comments, complains and etc...
> > Perhaps I miss something obvious so don't hesitate to poke me.
> >
> > -- Cyrill
> > ---
> > x86,io-apic: Do not map IO-APIC direct registers twice
> >
> ...
> I know that I've occasionally removed
>
> apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE, "mapped IOAPIC
> to %08lx (%08lx)\n",
>
> already fixed in v2, just do not post updated version here.
>
> -- Cyrill

Forgot to mention that I know this double for() over nr_ioapics
is slowlest approach but firstly I need to be sure that this
idea works in general/simple way before speedup it.

-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Cyrill Gorcunov on
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:56:35AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 03:22:55PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >>> Please review, I didn't manage to test (emulate actually since I don't
> >>>
> > ...
> >
> > First of all -- thanks a lot for review Yinghai!
> >
> >>> Also insert_resourse will not fail anymore on 1K aligned io-apics.
> >> looks that we don't need that ...
> >> not io_apic_base already have that + &. left problems are
> >> 1. display.
> >> 2. insert resource problem.
> >>
> >> YH
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> >> index 90e8bc5..6a9379b 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> >> @@ -4140,11 +4140,13 @@ fake_ioapic_page:
> >> set_fixmap_nocache(idx, ioapic_phys);
> >> apic_printk(APIC_VERBOSE,
> >> "mapped IOAPIC to %08lx (%08lx)\n",
> >> - __fix_to_virt(idx), ioapic_phys);
> >> + __fix_to_virt(idx) + (ioapic_phys & ~PAGE_MASK),
> >
> > Don't understand, why? What is wrong with physical address,
> > could you elaborate please?
>
> ioapic_phys could be 1k aligned, but __fix_to_virt(idx) will always return 4k aligned.

yeah, I just misread your patch, I thought you've changed second argument,
sorry. OK, I see what you mean, good catch, thanks!

>
> >
> >> + ioapic_phys);
> >> idx++;
> >>
> >> + /* spec says size is 1024 */
> >
> > Hmm, MP says nothing about size of IO-APIC direct registers
> > cound and as a result -- the size of MMIO. It will (and
> > is) differ between IO-APIC versions. An example -- IO-APIC EOI register
> > which 82489DX just dont have at all. At moment (ICH-10) the lenght is 68
> > bytes so you may note the comment in the former patch that we "hope" such
> > a size will be enough for quite a long time to cover all direct register
> > space an IO-APIC provides (though to be precise from this 68 bytes only
> > index,data,eoi registers specified).
> >
> >> ioapic_res->start = ioapic_phys;
> >> - ioapic_res->end = ioapic_phys + PAGE_SIZE-1;
> >> + ioapic_res->end = ioapic_phys + (1<<10) - 1;
> >> ioapic_res++;
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > I think I've compicated the patch/idea too much indeed :)
> > Since we have fixmap for all io_apics build time reserved
> > even if some io-apic is 1K aligned we still may use new
> > fixmap index. So only issue remains -- resource allocation.
> > Here is an updated patch. Please review.
>
> 2. print out ...?

Print out what? Not sure I understand you right. Perhaps you mean
to check insert_resourse results?

>
> YH
>
-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/