From: Jesse Barnes on
On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:13:20 -0700
Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org> wrote:

> also it will add back default range to legacy IOH
>

This patch is a bit short on details. Are we fixing a real bug here
that _CRS fails to cover? Or is it just for debug purposes?

--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Yinghai Lu on
On 03/22/2010 09:16 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:13:20 -0700
> Yinghai Lu <yinghai(a)kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> also it will add back default range to legacy IOH
>>
>
> This patch is a bit short on details. Are we fixing a real bug here
> that _CRS fails to cover? Or is it just for debug purposes?
>

yes for debug purpose. anyway BIOS need to keep them the same.

one from HW register reading, and one from acpi.

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/