zfs and largefiles
in [Solaris]
|
From: CJT on 4 May 2008 10:04 Apparently zfs file systems are not mounted with attribute largefiles by default, and I haven't been able to find in the documentation how to set it. Can somebody point me in the right direction? -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...(a)prodigy.net.
From: CJT on 4 May 2008 10:33 CJT wrote: > Apparently zfs file systems are not mounted with attribute largefiles by > default, and I haven't been able to find in the documentation how to set > it. Can somebody point me in the right direction? > I think I've answered my own question -- it's the program I'm using, which is apparently not largefiles aware, and not the mount, that is causing my largefiles problem ... although it would be reassuring to see largefiles in the list of mount attributes. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...(a)prodigy.net.
From: Dave Uhring on 4 May 2008 10:39 On Sun, 04 May 2008 14:33:20 +0000, CJT wrote: > I think I've answered my own question -- it's the program I'm using, > which is apparently not largefiles aware, and not the mount, that is > causing my largefiles problem ... although it would be reassuring to > see largefiles in the list of mount attributes. What does the Z stand for? :>
From: CJT on 4 May 2008 11:08 Dave Uhring wrote: > On Sun, 04 May 2008 14:33:20 +0000, CJT wrote: > > >>I think I've answered my own question -- it's the program I'm using, >>which is apparently not largefiles aware, and not the mount, that is >>causing my largefiles problem ... although it would be reassuring to >>see largefiles in the list of mount attributes. > > > What does the Z stand for? :> > There's a difference between a file system and a file. :-) -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...(a)prodigy.net.
From: CJT on 4 May 2008 22:49
Dave Uhring wrote: > On Sun, 04 May 2008 10:08:16 -0500, CJT wrote: > >>Dave Uhring wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 04 May 2008 14:33:20 +0000, CJT wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I think I've answered my own question -- it's the program I'm using, >>>>which is apparently not largefiles aware, and not the mount, that is >>>>causing my largefiles problem ... although it would be reassuring to >>>>see largefiles in the list of mount attributes. >>> >>>What does the Z stand for? :> >>> >>There's a difference between a file system and a file. :-) > > > http://blogs.sun.com/BVass/resource/SolarisRHELWinComparison.pdf > > 2^64 bytes > Whatever. Historically, the maximum didn't necessarily take effect by default -- hence the "largefiles" attribute. I know you're aware of it. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...(a)prodigy.net. |