From: Barney Desmond on
On 23 February 2010 19:34, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen(a)iki.fi> wrote:
> 2010/2/23 ram <ram(a)netcore.co.in>:
>> All the files which I used for my compile are here
>>
>> https://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/postfix-2.7.0.rpmfiles.tgz
>>
>> You may want to hash-off the dotname patch which I use on my machines
>>
>> Of course take care of the usual warning :-)
>> These are files that worked for me, there is absolutely *no guarantee*
>> that this work for you.
>>
>> If someone can help me with a doc on  creating a  ".src.rpm" package I
>> would like to try it
>
> how about command: rpmbuild -bb myprogram.spec

No, that is incorrect. From the rpmbuild manpage:
-ba Build binary and source packages (after doing the %prep,
%build, and %install stages).
-bb Build a binary package (after doing the %prep, %build,
and %install stages).
-bs Build just the source package.

We use -ba when rolling our RPMs. -bs would be suitable if you *only*
want a Source RPM. If you can build the RPM (it sounds like you were
successful) then the SRPM should be no problem.

I've tried the procedure from the aforementioned link
(http://www.kutukupret.com/2010/02/08/compiling-postfix-2-7-0-as-rpm-package/)
and had no problems building the RPMs. I haven't tested the RPMs yet.

From: Hari Hendaryanto on

> If someone can help me with a doc on creating a ".src.rpm" package I
> would like to try it
>
>
> Thanks
> Ram
>
>
>
actually,when you're follow workaround on my site you got both binary
and source.
usually located at %_topdir/SRPMS/
spec files always produces both binary and source when rebuild with
rpmbuild -ba isn't it? :)

From: Emmanuel Seyman on
* ram [23/02/2010 09:01] :
>
> If someone can help me with a doc on creating a ".src.rpm" package I
> would like to try it

I've always found Guru Labs' guide to be helpful:
http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/GURULABS-RPM-LAB/GURULABS-RPM-GUIDE-v1.0.PDF

Emmanuel

From: Carl Brewer on
Carlos Williams wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
> to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
> time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.7 on my
> CentOS x64 server. I realize Simon was responsible for creating the
> previous RPM's available on a mirror but I don't know if he is still
> doing so. I never saw a 2.6.5-3 RPM (only 2.6.5-1) and wasn't sure if
> he would continue to do so or only with major release versions.
>
> Thanks for any info!
>
> **PS**
>
> Yes I am very aware anyone including myself could create a RPM from
> source using the SRPM's however I attempted this in the past and
> failed miserably.
>

Simon's RPMs are online!

http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.7/

From: Robert Schetterer on
Am 24.02.2010 14:04, schrieb Carl Brewer:
> Carlos Williams wrote:
>> Does anyone happen to know if anyone is kindly dedicating their time
>> to creating a Postfix 2.7 RPM for download? I know this is extremely
>> time consuming but I am really interested to try out Postfix 2.7 on my
>> CentOS x64 server. I realize Simon was responsible for creating the
>> previous RPM's available on a mirror but I don't know if he is still
>> doing so. I never saw a 2.6.5-3 RPM (only 2.6.5-1) and wasn't sure if
>> he would continue to do so or only with major release versions.
>>
>> Thanks for any info!
>>
>> **PS**
>>
>> Yes I am very aware anyone including myself could create a RPM from
>> source using the SRPM's however I attempted this in the past and
>> failed miserably.
>>
>
> Simon's RPMs are online!
>
> http://ftp.wl0.org/official/2.7/
>
>
hoping, suse gets them too in their build service, soon

--
Best Regards

MfG Robert Schetterer

Germany/Munich/Bavaria

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: smtpd_banner question
Next: Mail Transport Unavailable