From: Milhouse Van Houten on
Despite this being out for a few weeks, the download is only a generic
placeholder. Did MS accidentally forget about it? I left a note on the page
shortly after it came out, but nothing has happened since.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976883

From: MowGreen on
Milhouse Van Houten wrote:
> Despite this being out for a few weeks, the download is only a generic
> placeholder. Did MS accidentally forget about it? I left a note on the
> page shortly after it came out, but nothing has happened since.
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976883

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976883

It's a Hotfix, not an update, which means one has to *contact MS* for it
by clicking the 'View and request hotfix downloads' link at the top
right of the web page.

" ... this hotfix is intended to correct only the problem that is
described in this article. Apply this hotfix only to systems that are
experiencing the problem described in this article. This hotfix might
receive additional testing. Therefore, if you are not severely affected
by this problem, we recommend that you wait for the next software update
that contains this hotfix. "


MowGreen
================
*-343-* FDNY
Never Forgotten
================

banthecheck.com
"Security updates should *never* have *non-security content* prechecked
From: Milhouse Van Houten on
"MowGreen" <mowgreen(a)nowandzen.com> wrote in message
news:eSEGRCluKHA.3896(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Milhouse Van Houten wrote:
>> Despite this being out for a few weeks, the download is only a generic
>> placeholder. Did MS accidentally forget about it? I left a note on the
>> page shortly after it came out, but nothing has happened since.
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976883
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976883
>
> It's a Hotfix, not an update, which means one has to *contact MS* for it
> by clicking the 'View and request hotfix downloads' link at the top right
> of the web page.
>

Yes, I meant the *download* is only a small stub file. There's no update in
it.

From: MowGreen on
Milhouse Van Houten wrote:
> "MowGreen" <mowgreen(a)nowandzen.com> wrote in message
> news:eSEGRCluKHA.3896(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>> Milhouse Van Houten wrote:
>>> Despite this being out for a few weeks, the download is only a generic
>>> placeholder. Did MS accidentally forget about it? I left a note on the
>>> page shortly after it came out, but nothing has happened since.
>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976883
>>
>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976883
>>
>> It's a Hotfix, not an update, which means one has to *contact MS* for it
>> by clicking the 'View and request hotfix downloads' link at the top
>> right of the web page.
>>
>
> Yes, I meant the *download* is only a small stub file. There's no update
> in it.


Then the stub is correct as there is NO update to download. You *must*
contact MS for the *Hotfix* but ONLY if the system is experiencing the
same issues as laid out in the KB article.
If this affects enough systems then MS will offer an *update* for the
issue. Comprende ?


MowGreen
================
*-343-* FDNY
Never Forgotten
================

banthecheck.com
"Security updates should *never* have *non-security content* prechecked
From: Milhouse Van Houten on
No comprende.

I'm familiar with the type of KB you're referring to, but this obviously
isn't one of those. This one HAS a download available for it. The page even
shows what the names and dates of the files are. It even says "If the hotfix
is available for download, there is a 'Hotfix download available' section at
the top of this Knowledge Base article" -- and there is. You can request the
file and download the file. This is NOT one of the ones that you have to
call MS to get (thankfully there are fewer and fewer of those these days).

It's just that they -- oopsie -- forgot to put the actual payload in it.
There's just a placeholder.

"MowGreen" <mowgreen(a)nowandzen.com> wrote in message
news:OnIlUsyuKHA.6064(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Milhouse Van Houten wrote:
>> "MowGreen" <mowgreen(a)nowandzen.com> wrote in message
>> news:eSEGRCluKHA.3896(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>> Milhouse Van Houten wrote:
>>>> Despite this being out for a few weeks, the download is only a generic
>>>> placeholder. Did MS accidentally forget about it? I left a note on the
>>>> page shortly after it came out, but nothing has happened since.
>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976883
>>>
>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/976883
>>>
>>> It's a Hotfix, not an update, which means one has to *contact MS* for it
>>> by clicking the 'View and request hotfix downloads' link at the top
>>> right of the web page.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I meant the *download* is only a small stub file. There's no update
>> in it.
>
>
> Then the stub is correct as there is NO update to download. You *must*
> contact MS for the *Hotfix* but ONLY if the system is experiencing the
> same issues as laid out in the KB article.
> If this affects enough systems then MS will offer an *update* for the
> issue. Comprende ?
>
>
> MowGreen
> ================
> *-343-* FDNY
> Never Forgotten
> ================
>
> banthecheck.com
> "Security updates should *never* have *non-security content* prechecked