Prev: Application Domain
Next: Some question about Application Domain
From: Tony Johansson on 1 May 2010 18:39
many thanks.
I had looked at the wrong question.

//Tony


From: PvdG42 on 2 May 2010 09:24

"Tony Johansson" <johansson.andersson(a)telia.com> wrote in message
news:OUFtlHU6KHA.1888(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>
> I see what you mean but assume that I create a person object from the
> Person class like this
> Person myPerson = new Person(add some data here to the c-tor);
>
> I never used to set null to the object like this
> myPerson=null;
> So If I don't do this will this object myPerson never be garbage collected
> because you will still have a reference.
>
> So do you mean that when I'm finish with an object assign null to the
> object
>
> //Tony
>
As I see the issue was resolved in another response, this is of little value
to the thread.
However, my reference was from C++, which has no automatic garbage
collection. Thus, the object is destroyed using delete, leaving the pointer
(potentially) to cause issues. In your C# example, the rules of scope also
apply, so once the block of code where your object and object variable were
created finishes executing, both are gone.



First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Application Domain
Next: Some question about Application Domain