From: mitch.nicolas.raemsch on
Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

From: Igor on
On Apr 19, 10:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote:
> Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
> forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
> together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
> quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
> lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.

Look up the hypothetical hyperweak interaction. They'll be a test
later, which you are sure to fail, and hopefully be banned from
sci.physics forever.

From: mitch.nicolas.raemsch on
On Apr 20, 7:46 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
> On Apr 19, 10:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
> > forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
> > together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
> > quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
> > lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.
>
> Look up the hypothetical hyperweak interaction.  They'll be a test
> later, which you are sure to fail, and hopefully be banned from
> sci.physics forever.

There is no weak force. There is radioactive instability in my
opinion. They got it wrong having to call it a force.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
From: PD on
On Apr 19, 9:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote:
> Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
> forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
> together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
> quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
> lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.
>
> Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008

Mitch, Halley's comet is attracted to the sun by the force of gravity.
Yet, every 76 years or so, it passes its closest point to the sun
(perihelion) and then gets further away from the sun. It does this
without gravity turning into a repulsive force to push the comet away.
It has repeated this behavior in documented fashion for thousands of
years. It would be useful for you to understand how this can happen
without being any oxymoron.

PD
From: mitch.nicolas.raemsch on
On Apr 20, 1:26 pm, PD <TheDraperFam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 19, 9:09 pm, mitch.nicolas.raem...(a)gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Protons and electrons are attractive and at the same time they must be
> > forced together. This is an oxymoron. Also interesting is when forced
> > together they become a neutron and this is due to one of the protons
> > quarks being transmuted by the electron. An understanding of how a
> > lepton can change a sub hadron should be forthcoming.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008
>
> Mitch, Halley's comet is attracted to the sun by the force of gravity.
> Yet, every 76 years or so, it passes its closest point to the sun
> (perihelion) and then gets further away from the sun. It does this
> without gravity turning into a repulsive force to push the comet away.
> It has repeated this behavior in documented fashion for thousands of
> years. It would be useful for you to understand how this can happen
> without being any oxymoron.
>
> PD

The only answer is that atomic shells hold electrons and protons at
bay. Otherwise their attraction would bring them together. But what
are shells made of?

Demicritus said atoms are little hard things.

Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008