From: WallyWallWhackr on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:25:57 +0200, Mateusz Viste
<mateusz(a)no-spam.please> wrote:

>On Saturday 19 June 2010 09:21, UpGrade wrote:
>> If this is overclocking,
>
>No, it is not.
>
>> I think you have too much time on your hands.
>
>You clearly didn't understood (or misunderstood) my initial post.
>
>> Attempting to do it with this will likely only get you a heat related
>> FOOL failure.
>
>Actually, what I am trying to achieve is to *lower* the temperature (and
>battery lifetime), by lowering the CPU freq and voltage when the system
>is idle. That's what cpufreq is about.
>
>Best regards,
>Mateusz Viste


I post corrected then.

Yours may be a laptop. Mine is a little 7" x 7" x 1.5" "Nettop". I got
ten degrees lower temps on it by performing this process alone:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/48373875(a)N06/sets/72157623529909513/

Mainly involves complete disassembly, and an enlargement of all the
ventilation holes in the case and internal shield.

So much for temps. Batt life will be increased by your method, but you
should see just how much current difference there is between the two, as
I do not think you get more than a percent or two.
From: VioletaPachydermata on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 20:27:44 +0200, Mateusz Viste
<mateusz(a)no-spam.please> wrote:

>> So I still find it hard to understand why you need your browser or
>> email client to pop up one second quicker than it did before.
>
>Nobody tries to do that.


Sure they do. Some folks cannot handle that they do not get immediate
response and go out of their way to get real or imagined gains.

I didn't make it up.
From: WallyWallWhackr on
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:59:08 -0500, mjt <myswtestYOURSHOES(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 13:56:32 -0500
>mjt <myswtestYOURSHOES(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:10:46 +0200
>> Mateusz Viste <mateusz(a)no-spam.please> wrote:
>>
>> > Is there any way I could run acpi-cpufreq on an ATOM N270 CPU?
>> [snipped]
>>
>> question: what's your requirement for this?
>
>i know it's in bad taste to answer back to your
>own post,

Folks are just too damned PIGGYfied these days.

There is nothing wrong with what you did for those of us that are not
sociocentrically brain dead.