Prev: De Walls shows, all forces come from charge
Next: Centre of mass inertial framesy are the unique ones in 1905 Relativity
From: guskz on 25 Jun 2010 06:32
Some important formulas show it's impossible for cosmic rays to
produce 10^20 eV...Hawking's formula shows it's impossible for Aunt Al
& LHC to produce a black hole.

10^17 eV cosmic ray simulation produces 14 TeV particles.

In pool, a cue ball collision can cause three or more balls to stick
together as they move forward...thus generating a higher kinetic
energy. ....but in no way do these 3 pool balls occupy the space thus
density of one ball, likewise for 10^20 eV to produce a black hole.

From: PD on 25 Jun 2010 11:52
On Jun 25, 5:32 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Some important formulas show it's impossible for cosmic rays to
> produce 10^20 eV.

A formula is useless if it "proves" something cannot exist that has
been observed directly to exist.

>..Hawking's formula shows it's impossible for Aunt Al
> & LHC to produce a black hole.
>
> 10^17 eV cosmic ray simulation produces 14 TeV particles.
>
> In pool, a cue ball collision can cause three or more balls to stick
> together as they move forward...thus generating a higher kinetic
> energy. ....but in no way do these 3 pool balls occupy the space thus
> density of one ball, likewise for 10^20 eV to produce a black hole.

From: guskz on 25 Jun 2010 21:48
On Jun 25, 11:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 5:32 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Some important formulas show it's impossible for cosmic rays to
> > produce 10^20 eV.
>
> A formula is useless if it "proves" something cannot exist that has
> been observed directly to exist.
>

#1. That or the observation is incorrect.

#2. A brain is useless is it "proves" it cannot understand what is
also written below here@!

> >..Hawking's formula shows it's impossible for Aunt Al
> > & LHC to produce a black hole.
>
> > 10^17 eV cosmic ray simulation produces 14 TeV particles.
>
> > In pool, a cue ball collision can cause three or more balls to stick
> > together as they move forward...thus generating a higher kinetic
> > energy. ....but in no way do these 3 pool balls occupy the space thus
> > density of one ball, likewise for 10^20 eV to produce a black hole.
>
>

From: PD on 26 Jun 2010 10:08
On Jun 25, 8:48 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 11:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 25, 5:32 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Some important formulas show it's impossible for cosmic rays to
> > > produce 10^20 eV.
>
> > A formula is useless if it "proves" something cannot exist that has
> > been observed directly to exist.
>
> #1. That or the observation is incorrect.

It's independently confirmed. What now?

>
> #2. A brain is useless is it "proves" it cannot understand what is
> also written below here@!
>
>
>
> > >..Hawking's formula shows it's impossible for Aunt Al
> > > & LHC to produce a black hole.
>
> > > 10^17 eV cosmic ray simulation produces 14 TeV particles.
>
> > > In pool, a cue ball collision can cause three or more balls to stick
> > > together as they move forward...thus generating a higher kinetic
> > > energy. ....but in no way do these 3 pool balls occupy the space thus
> > > density of one ball, likewise for 10^20 eV to produce a black hole.

From: guskz on 26 Jun 2010 18:34
On Jun 26, 10:08 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 8:48 pm, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 25, 11:52 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 25, 5:32 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Some important formulas show it's impossible for cosmic rays to
> > > > produce 10^20 eV.
>
> > > A formula is useless if it "proves" something cannot exist that has
> > > been observed directly to exist.
>
> > #1. That or the observation is incorrect.
>
> It's independently confirmed. What now?
>

Not really, if so then what is an electron cloud, since it's much
bigger than an electron, then what is it?

How can they tell how many electrons in a cloud if they can't tell
it's an electron in orbit?

From what I read they can't really detect particles...just mass and
velocity by radiation deviation and momentum.

Show me how their detectors determined the mass of a cosmic ray that
produces 10^20 eV, you don't know how, and now you are precipitating
to find how.

Strange how you need the internet to convey your claim.





>
>
> > #2. A brain is useless is it "proves" it cannot understand what is
> > also written below here@!
>
> > > >..Hawking's formula shows it's impossible for Aunt Al
> > > > & LHC to produce a black hole.
>
> > > > 10^17 eV cosmic ray simulation produces 14 TeV particles.
>
> > > > In pool, a cue ball collision can cause three or more balls to stick
> > > > together as they move forward...thus generating a higher kinetic
> > > > energy. ....but in no way do these 3 pool balls occupy the space thus
> > > > density of one ball, likewise for 10^20 eV to produce a black hole.
>
>

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: De Walls shows, all forces come from charge
Next: Centre of mass inertial framesy are the unique ones in 1905 Relativity