Prev: Verlinde Floats Off Earth!
Next: Question about relativity
From: mpc755 on 14 Jul 2010 11:38
On Jul 14, 11:29 am, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
> mpc755 schrieb:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 3:56 am, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
> >> mpc755 schrieb:
>
> >> To have such a behavior, the timeline should point in our direction, but
> >> only for the part that is moving towards us. This looks like the
> >> structure would receive light fom here. This means the structure is
> >> actually spherical shaped, but the frequency of observed radiation
> >> depends on the direction of observation. This makes the structure look
> >> like kind of explosion in spacetime.
> >> This could only be possible, if time is actually multidimensional and is
> >> 'pointing' in different directions, but this would violate the big-bang
> >> idea, because that would require only one single line.
>
> >> TH
>
> > Instead of thinking of the structure as a kind of explosion of
> > spacetime, think of the structure as the expansion of dark matter.
>
> > What is often discussed as the curvature of spacetime due to its
> > interaction with matter is the displacement of dark matter by matter.
>
> I personally prefer energy streams of dark energy and radiant energy as
> dominant factors. The superposition of both behaviors is what we call
> matter, what are in fact three-dimensional patterns of standing waves,
> generated by spiraling in  dark energy and spiraling out radiant energy..
>
> TH

What is described as dark energy is a change in the state of dark
matter.
From: Thomas Heger on 14 Jul 2010 11:47
mpc755 schrieb:
> On Jul 14, 11:29 am, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
>> mpc755 schrieb:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 14, 3:56 am, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
>>>> mpc755 schrieb:
>>>> To have such a behavior, the timeline should point in our direction, but
>>>> only for the part that is moving towards us. This looks like the
>>>> structure would receive light fom here. This means the structure is
>>>> actually spherical shaped, but the frequency of observed radiation
>>>> depends on the direction of observation. This makes the structure look
>>>> like kind of explosion in spacetime.
>>>> This could only be possible, if time is actually multidimensional and is
>>>> 'pointing' in different directions, but this would violate the big-bang
>>>> idea, because that would require only one single line.
>>>> TH
>>> Instead of thinking of the structure as a kind of explosion of
>>> spacetime, think of the structure as the expansion of dark matter.
>>> What is often discussed as the curvature of spacetime due to its
>>> interaction with matter is the displacement of dark matter by matter.
>> I personally prefer energy streams of dark energy and radiant energy as
>> dominant factors. The superposition of both behaviors is what we call
>> matter, what are in fact three-dimensional patterns of standing waves,
>> generated by spiraling in dark energy and spiraling out radiant energy.
>>
>> TH
>
> What is described as dark energy is a change in the state of dark
> matter.
For dark matter I think about as opposite to 'usual' matter. What do you
think about the 'negative' to matter? Something like the thing left
behind, if we take all the particles away.

TH
From: mpc755 on 14 Jul 2010 11:56
On Jul 14, 11:47 am, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
> mpc755 schrieb:
>
> > On Jul 14, 11:29 am, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
> >> mpc755 schrieb:
>
> >>> On Jul 14, 3:56 am, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
> >>>> mpc755 schrieb:
> >>>> To have such a behavior, the timeline should point in our direction, but
> >>>> only for the part that is moving towards us. This looks like the
> >>>> structure would receive light fom here. This means the structure is
> >>>> actually spherical shaped, but the frequency of observed radiation
> >>>> depends on the direction of observation. This makes the structure look
> >>>> like kind of explosion in spacetime.
> >>>> This could only be possible, if time is actually multidimensional and is
> >>>> 'pointing' in different directions, but this would violate the big-bang
> >>>> idea, because that would require only one single line.
> >>>> TH
> >>> Instead of thinking of the structure as a kind of explosion of
> >>> spacetime, think of the structure as the expansion of dark matter.
> >>> What is often discussed as the curvature of spacetime due to its
> >>> interaction with matter is the displacement of dark matter by matter.
> >> I personally prefer energy streams of dark energy and radiant energy as
> >> dominant factors. The superposition of both behaviors is what we call
> >> matter, what are in fact three-dimensional patterns of standing waves,
> >> generated by spiraling in  dark energy and spiraling out radiant energy.
>
> >> TH
>
> > What is described as dark energy is a change in the state of dark
> > matter.
>
> For dark matter I think about as opposite to 'usual' matter. What do you
> think about the 'negative' to matter? Something like the thing left
> behind, if we take all the particles away.
>
> TH

I think of dark matter as a frictionless superfluid one-something. The
analogy for gravity is placing a bowling ball into a tank of water.
The bowling ball displaces the water. The water exerts pressure
towards the bowling ball. The pressure exerted by dark matter towards
matter is gravity.

The analogy for the expanding universe is a hose. The dark matter is
emitted into the jet stream of the Universe similar to water expanding
out of a hose.
From: Thomas Heger on 14 Jul 2010 12:12
mpc755 schrieb:
> On Jul 14, 11:47 am, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
>> mpc755 schrieb:
>>

>>> What is described as dark energy is a change in the state of dark
>>> matter.
>> For dark matter I think about as opposite to 'usual' matter. What do you
>> think about the 'negative' to matter? Something like the thing left
>> behind, if we take all the particles away.
>>
>> TH
>
> I think of dark matter as a frictionless superfluid one-something. The
> analogy for gravity is placing a bowling ball into a tank of water.
> The bowling ball displaces the water. The water exerts pressure
> towards the bowling ball. The pressure exerted by dark matter towards
> matter is gravity.
>
> The analogy for the expanding universe is a hose. The dark matter is
> emitted into the jet stream of the Universe similar to water expanding
> out of a hose.
The question about what that 'really' is, I tried to avoid. You may call
it 'eather', 'spacetime', 'frictionless fluid' or whatever. I personally
think, there would be no material background at all and we could say
'nothing' as well. But - as said- I would prefer to circumvent that
question, but instead research the behavior of this 'whatever'.

TH
From: mpc755 on 14 Jul 2010 12:14
On Jul 14, 12:12 pm, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
> mpc755 schrieb:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 11:47 am, Thomas Heger <ttt_...(a)web.de> wrote:
> >> mpc755 schrieb:
>
> >>> What is described as dark energy is a change in the state of dark
> >>> matter.
> >> For dark matter I think about as opposite to 'usual' matter. What do you
> >> think about the 'negative' to matter? Something like the thing left
> >> behind, if we take all the particles away.
>
> >> TH
>
> > I think of dark matter as a frictionless superfluid one-something. The
> > analogy for gravity is placing a bowling ball into a tank of water.
> > The bowling ball displaces the water. The water exerts pressure
> > towards the bowling ball. The pressure exerted by dark matter towards
> > matter is gravity.
>
> > The analogy for the expanding universe is a hose. The dark matter is
> > emitted into the jet stream of the Universe similar to water expanding
> > out of a hose.
>
> The question about what that 'really' is, I tried to avoid. You may call
> it 'eather', 'spacetime', 'frictionless fluid' or whatever. I personally
> think, there would be no material background at all and we could say
> 'nothing' as well. But - as said- I would prefer to circumvent that
> question, but instead research the behavior of this 'whatever'.
>
> TH

With 'nothing' there is no gravity.

Pressure exerted by displaced dark matter towards matter is gravity.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: Verlinde Floats Off Earth!
Next: Question about relativity