Prev: The Planet Attractor Action, July 28, 2010 johnreed
Next: Ballistic theory of light demolished
From: Ken S. Tucker on 28 Jul 2010 21:33
On Jul 21, 7:55 am, Paul Merriam <pmerri...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Why hasn't anyone taken up Francis' RQG? If it is valid it seems like
> people should be studying it. How is it different from LQG? Why do
> people study the latter?

Many theories have been proposed to do RQG, indeed we have a
solution that generalizes that, however most are superficial and lack
any new predictive power, to justify incorporation into mainstream
science, that may require obsoleting $billions of text books.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: The Planet Attractor Action, July 28, 2010 johnreed
Next: Ballistic theory of light demolished