"Fermat's Last Theorem" Disproved? Why not to proof it anyway!
in [Math]
|
Prev: inverting elliptic integral second kind
Next: Kip Thorne. Objects do not fall faster than light in a black hole
From: Roman B. Binder on 4 Aug 2010 06:24 Hi, I used to oversee the possibilities of only such property: { (m+n)/2 only once (m-n)/4 at least or 2^k where k=2 or bigger number or inverse for m and n as some odd numbers } could size the FLT ... Nowadays it looks, that it is some possibility for: "Breaking up the TAB ideal parameters of FLT" See such topic of mine here in sci. math. Thank You for Your attention! Ro-Bin |