From: tommala on
Hello,

Could anyone tell me if considering Frequency Flat fading channel as
channel with one tap and Frequency Selective fading channel as channel with
many taps is correct?

Thank You in advance
From: Jerry Avins on
tommala wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could anyone tell me if considering Frequency Flat fading channel as
> channel with one tap and Frequency Selective fading channel as channel with
> many taps is correct?

Channels don't have taps. Are you confusing a thing with a model of it?

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
�����������������������������������������������������������������������
From: tommala on
Yes, I was thinking of channel modeling.
From: Steve Pope on
Jerry Avins <jya(a)ieee.org> wrote:

>tommala wrote:

>> Could anyone tell me if considering Frequency Flat fading channel as
>> channel with one tap and Frequency Selective fading channel as channel with
>> many taps is correct?

>Channels don't have taps. Are you confusing a thing with a model of it?

Maybe the word "considering" means "modeling" in this sentence.
(Possibly from a non-native-English speaker.)

Steve
From: Jerry Avins on
Steve Pope wrote:
> Jerry Avins <jya(a)ieee.org> wrote:
>
>> tommala wrote:
>
>>> Could anyone tell me if considering Frequency Flat fading channel as
>>> channel with one tap and Frequency Selective fading channel as channel with
>>> many taps is correct?
>
>> Channels don't have taps. Are you confusing a thing with a model of it?
>
> Maybe the word "considering" means "modeling" in this sentence.
> (Possibly from a non-native-English speaker.)

We guessed the same truth.

Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
�����������������������������������������������������������������������