From: BURT on
Point mass can in no way rotate. Spin is for a changing size of
rotation. Particles never rotate or have changes in size.

But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Victar Shawberger on
On Jul 5, 7:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Point mass can in no way rotate.

Yes, they we don't know

> Spin is for a changing size of
> rotation. Particles never rotate or have changes in size.

Whatever

>
> But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push.

Hence you need a cross section, and you can't have it for a particle

>
> Mitch Raemsch
From: Igor on
On Jul 5, 1:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Point mass can in no way rotate. Spin is for a changing size of
> rotation. Particles never rotate or have changes in size.
>
> But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Nobody ever said a point particle had to rotate. A body does not need
to be rotating to possess angular momentum.

From: BURT on
On Jul 5, 7:17 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 1:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Point mass can in no way rotate. Spin is for a changing size of
> > rotation. Particles never rotate or have changes in size.
>
> > But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push.
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Nobody ever said a point particle had to rotate.  

But they say Spin which is even more nonsensical. Spin is for changing
sizes of rotation rate; like an ice skater pulling in her arms.

Mitch Raemsch

> A body does not need
> to be rotating to possess angular momentum.

From: Igor on
On Jul 5, 5:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 7:17 am, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 5, 1:43 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Point mass can in no way rotate. Spin is for a changing size of
> > > rotation. Particles never rotate or have changes in size.
>
> > > But they do vibrate by their quantum aether wave flow push.
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > Nobody ever said a point particle had to rotate.  
>
> But they say Spin which is even more nonsensical. Spin is for changing
> sizes of rotation rate; like an ice skater pulling in her arms.
>
> Mitch Raemsch
>
>
>
> > A body does not need
> > to be rotating to possess angular momentum.

Spin is an operator on a Hilbert space. It has nothing to do with
classical rotation.