From: Wolfgang Weisselberg on
Peter <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
> "Wolfgang Weisselberg" <ozcvgtt02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message

>> And here I thought you stopped digging. In what context of
>> photography does black not radiate?

> Exactly how does your claimed black radiation affect fine art photography?

China doesn't affect fine art photography either, do you
suppose in the context of photography it does not exist?

BTW, your goal post moving becomes very obvious.

-Wolfgang
From: Wolfgang Weisselberg on
Peter <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
> "Wolfgang Weisselberg" <ozcvgtt02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>> Peter <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
>>> "Wolfgang Weisselberg" <ozcvgtt02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message

>>>> And here I thought you stopped digging. In what context of
>>>> photography does black not radiate?

>>> Exactly how does your claimed black radiation affect fine art
>>> photography?

>> China doesn't affect fine art photography either, do you
>> suppose in the context of photography it does not exist?

>> BTW, your goal post moving becomes very obvious.

> It is obvious that you know a little about a lot of things and are seeking
> to demonstrate your superiority.

Ah, now we steer to the ad hominem.

-Wolfgang
From: Outing Trolls is FUN! on
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:44:33 +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg
<ozcvgtt02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote:

>Peter <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
>> "Wolfgang Weisselberg" <ozcvgtt02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>>> Peter <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:
>>>> "Wolfgang Weisselberg" <ozcvgtt02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message
>
>>>>> And here I thought you stopped digging. In what context of
>>>>> photography does black not radiate?
>
>>>> Exactly how does your claimed black radiation affect fine art
>>>> photography?
>
>>> China doesn't affect fine art photography either, do you
>>> suppose in the context of photography it does not exist?
>
>>> BTW, your goal post moving becomes very obvious.
>
>> It is obvious that you know a little about a lot of things and are seeking
>> to demonstrate your superiority.
>
>Ah, now we steer to the ad hominem.
>
>-Wolfgang

Dear Puppygang Trollberg,

We all already know that you don't even own any camera. You know nothing
about how to use one properly. Yet you insist on handing out advice as if
you actually know something. When it's clear, and has been proved time and
time again, that you do not. You love to try to fool others into thinking
you know something. Like any virtual-life role-playing freak does in their
psychotic game of dungeons and dragons. You win if you think you have
fooled the other person who is playing a game just as psychotically as you
do. Now here you are complaining about someone using ad hominem attacks,
when you first started it. i.e. "BTW, your goal post moving becomes very
obvious."

Got a mirror, TROLL?

LOL!