From: David Howells on
Toshiyuki Okajima <toshi.okajima(a)> wrote:

> OK. I understand. So, your patch looks fine to me.
> ---
> Once find_keyring_by_name() returns -ENOKEY, the new user creates a
> new key. So, both the deleting key and the new key may exist.
> Therefore at next find_keyring_by_name() call, we should find the new
> key and ignore the deleting key.
> ---
> Today, I tested your patch and any problem didn't happen.
> So, I rewrote your patch. Here you are:


Note that the vertical lines in the right-hand column of your timeline don't
seem to line up correctly. Are you editing it in an editor with a
proportional font?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at