From: rdunlap on
On Sun, April 11, 2010 3:24 pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun 2010-04-11 20:58:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 20:51, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:47:01PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -99,6 +98,11 @@ config LOCALVERSION_AUTO
>>>>> � � � � appended after any matching localversion* files, and after
>>>>> the value � � � � set in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> + � � � Unfortunately, such finegrained versioning will mean that
>>>>> you will + � � � not be able to use modules for development; even
>>>>> "make modules"
>>>>> + � � � will change module versions, making recompiled modules
>>>>> impossible + � � � to insert into old kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's conditional BS.
>>>> Turn off CONFIG_MODVERSIONS already.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I disabled it ages ago. Even then (before git, probably even
>>> before bitkeeper) I had hard times inserting modules...
>>>
>>
>> I _had_ it off
>>
>>
>> # CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set
>>
>>
>> It seems some checking survives CONFIG_MODVERSIONS unset and that
>> checking is strict enough to refuse module load after one "make modules"
>> with LOCALVERSION_AUTO on...
>
> So instead of fixing the CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=n case you go the easy way
> of killing LOCALVERSION_AUTO ? Brilliant.

so it works for you? how so, please?

> Thanks,

(saving bits)

~Randy


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: rdunlap on
On Sun, April 11, 2010 3:24 pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun 2010-04-11 20:58:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 20:51, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan(a)gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:47:01PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -99,6 +98,11 @@ config LOCALVERSION_AUTO
>>>>> � � � � appended after any matching localversion* files, and after
>>>>> the value � � � � set in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> + � � � Unfortunately, such finegrained versioning will mean that
>>>>> you will + � � � not be able to use modules for development; even
>>>>> "make modules"
>>>>> + � � � will change module versions, making recompiled modules
>>>>> impossible + � � � to insert into old kernel.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's conditional BS.
>>>> Turn off CONFIG_MODVERSIONS already.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I disabled it ages ago. Even then (before git, probably even
>>> before bitkeeper) I had hard times inserting modules...
>>>
>>
>> I _had_ it off
>>
>>
>> # CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set
>>
>>
>> It seems some checking survives CONFIG_MODVERSIONS unset and that
>> checking is strict enough to refuse module load after one "make modules"
>> with LOCALVERSION_AUTO on...
>
> So instead of fixing the CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=n case you go the easy way
> of killing LOCALVERSION_AUTO ? Brilliant.

Pavel's original example (afaik) was on April 5:
Subject: 2.6.34-rc3: Can't insmod after make, because versions now differ?!

Apr 5 07:33:16 amd kernel: udlfb: version magic
'2.6.34-rc3-00345-ge8240f9-dirty SMP mod_unload CORE2 ' should be
'2.6.34-rc3-00344-g548fc0a-dirty SMP mod_unload CORE2 '


So what do you suggest? If the "magic" strings contain "-dirty ",
then ignore that and the 2 preceding hyphen-separated fields?

That could be dangerous if some kernel internal structures have changed.
I.e., user/developer beware.

Maybe ignore those strings iff some override has been set somewhere?

---
~Randy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Randy Dunlap on
On 04/11/10 19:56, rdunlap(a)xenotime.net wrote:
> On Sun, April 11, 2010 3:24 pm, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Sun 2010-04-11 20:58:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 20:51, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan(a)gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 06:47:01PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -99,6 +98,11 @@ config LOCALVERSION_AUTO
>>>>>> appended after any matching localversion* files, and after
>>>>>> the value set in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + Unfortunately, such finegrained versioning will mean that
>>>>>> you will + not be able to use modules for development; even
>>>>>> "make modules"
>>>>>> + will change module versions, making recompiled modules
>>>>>> impossible + to insert into old kernel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's conditional BS.
>>>>> Turn off CONFIG_MODVERSIONS already.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I disabled it ages ago. Even then (before git, probably even
>>>> before bitkeeper) I had hard times inserting modules...
>>>>
>>>
>>> I _had_ it off
>>>
>>>
>>> # CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems some checking survives CONFIG_MODVERSIONS unset and that
>>> checking is strict enough to refuse module load after one "make modules"
>>> with LOCALVERSION_AUTO on...
>>
>> So instead of fixing the CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=n case you go the easy way
>> of killing LOCALVERSION_AUTO ? Brilliant.
>
> Pavel's original example (afaik) was on April 5:
> Subject: 2.6.34-rc3: Can't insmod after make, because versions now differ?!
>
> Apr 5 07:33:16 amd kernel: udlfb: version magic
> '2.6.34-rc3-00345-ge8240f9-dirty SMP mod_unload CORE2 ' should be
> '2.6.34-rc3-00344-g548fc0a-dirty SMP mod_unload CORE2 '
>
>
> So what do you suggest? If the "magic" strings contain "-dirty ",
> then ignore that and the 2 preceding hyphen-separated fields?
>
> That could be dangerous if some kernel internal structures have changed.
> I.e., user/developer beware.
>
> Maybe ignore those strings iff some override has been set somewhere?

Pavel, does "modprobe --force" work?

--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Theodore Tso on

On Apr 11, 2010, at 10:56 PM, rdunlap(a)xenotime.net wrote:
>
> So what do you suggest? If the "magic" strings contain "-dirty ",
> then ignore that and the 2 preceding hyphen-separated fields?

I have a standard local patch that I've been carrying for I-don't-know-how-long which just nukes the "-dirty" suffix, which I needed because make-kpkg modifies some kernel build files, so the version string would always have
-dirty.

It's not hard to fix...

-- Ted

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Pavel Machek on
Hi!

> > > > That's conditional BS.
> > > > Turn off CONFIG_MODVERSIONS already.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I disabled it ages ago. Even then (before git, probably even
> > > before bitkeeper)
> > > I had hard times inserting modules...
> >
> > I _had_ it off
> >
> > # CONFIG_MODVERSIONS is not set
> >
> > It seems some checking survives CONFIG_MODVERSIONS unset and that
> > checking is strict enough to refuse module load after one "make
> > modules" with LOCALVERSION_AUTO on...
>
> So instead of fixing the CONFIG_MODVERSIONS=n case you go the easy way
> of killing LOCALVERSION_AUTO ? Brilliant.

In previous discussion, I was told that there's no bug to fix, that
everything works as intended.

I believe current behaiour is stupid, and I'd prefer *some* fix.

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/