MacPaint and QuickDraw
in [Mac Applications]
|
Prev: Simple Hack TO Get $1500 To Your PayPal Account.
Next: Temporary Finder Freeze-Ups? (MacBook, Tiger)
From: Jolly Roger on 20 Jul 2010 11:49 In article <michelle-B18A47.08033420072010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > The original source code for MacPaint 1.3 and for QuickDraw, along with > some history about them are available at > <http://www.computerhistory.org/highlights/macpaint/> > > According to MacRumorscom, the MacPaint source code has 5,822 lines of > Pascal and 3,583 lines of 68000 assembly. QuickDraw library has 17,101 > lines of 68000 assembly. Ahhh Pascal. I miss it sometimes! : ) -- Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me. E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts. JR
From: Steve on 27 Jul 2010 15:02 In comp.sys.mac.system Jolly Roger <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote: >In article ><michelle-B18A47.08033420072010(a)62-183-169-81.bb.dnainternet.fi>, > Michelle Steiner <michelle(a)michelle.org> wrote: > >> The original source code for MacPaint 1.3 and for QuickDraw, along with >> some history about them are available at >> <http://www.computerhistory.org/highlights/macpaint/> >> >> According to MacRumorscom, the MacPaint source code has 5,822 lines of >> Pascal and 3,583 lines of 68000 assembly. QuickDraw library has 17,101 >> lines of 68000 assembly. > >Ahhh Pascal. I miss it sometimes! : ) > I only had a brief encounter with Pascal and never had the opportunity to do anything with it other than school course work. I loved assembly but that only lasted through tech school too. -Steve
From: Salmon Egg on 27 Jul 2010 19:33 In article <i2nafk$6l9$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Steve <hexnut4(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I only had a brief encounter with Pascal and never had the opportunity to > do anything with it other than school course work. I loved assembly but > that only lasted through tech school too. I really liked Pascal. I even did a bit of programming for a Macintosh using it. There was a utility program whose name I forget, that would put together windows, menus, and other Mac features. These would be incorporated into an outline application. Then the individual operations that implemented these could be be programmed. I do little coding these days what cannot be implemented using Excel spreadsheet functions. I still would like to have an application like Turbo-Pascal for number and lexical crunching. Every time I look at something like Gnu Pascal, I feel overwhelmed. What, if anything is available for me? Bill -- An old man would be better off never having been born.
From: Jim Gibson on 28 Jul 2010 15:29 In article <SalmonEgg-03B86B.16333827072010(a)news60.forteinc.com>, Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > In article <i2nafk$6l9$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, > Steve <hexnut4(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I only had a brief encounter with Pascal and never had the opportunity to > > do anything with it other than school course work. I loved assembly but > > that only lasted through tech school too. > > I really liked Pascal. I even did a bit of programming for a Macintosh > using it. There was a utility program whose name I forget, that would > put together windows, menus, and other Mac features. These would be > incorporated into an outline application. Then the individual operations > that implemented these could be be programmed. > > I do little coding these days what cannot be implemented using Excel > spreadsheet functions. I still would like to have an application like > Turbo-Pascal for number and lexical crunching. Every time I look at > something like Gnu Pascal, I feel overwhelmed. > > What, if anything is available for me? Well, there is always Real Basic. I have not used it, but it has been around for a long time and looks pretty good. <http://www.realsoftware.com/> -- Jim Gibson
From: AES on 28 Jul 2010 18:50
> In article <SalmonEgg-03B86B.16333827072010(a)news60.forteinc.com>, > Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > I do little coding these days what cannot be implemented using Excel > > spreadsheet functions. I still would like to have an application like > > Turbo-Pascal for number and lexical crunching. Every time I look at > > something like Gnu Pascal, I feel overwhelmed. > > > > What, if anything is available for me? Mathematica? Fearfully expensive if you buy it. Also horribly complex if you try to get deep into it, but remarkably powerful, and not so bad if you stay with simple approaches. |