Prev: BOSS Purse wholesaler (httpwww.cntrade09.com) - (paypal payment)
Next: Cheap Wholesale A&F Long Sleeve
From: Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad on 13 Jul 2010 04:50
http://quadsearch.csd.auth.gr/ssearch.php?m=1&wtl=1&frop=501&lan=1&tos=2&pp=2&query=quantitative+measure+of+intelligence&query2=&sst=2&ResPerPage=500&frp_p=1&btn=1

You have to search this quadsearch engine using the full article name.
Otherwise it will not appear at all.

I am surprised that my conference paper was cited more times than
Multiple Intelligences theory, although google ranking is much much
lower at 1.

I had tried a few citation extracting engines. quadsearch is the third
one that I tried. It does not search properly when I use my name. Even
complete title search failed. You must make it a general search for
all languages and subjects. If you narrow the search, it will fail.
You must be willing to filter it yourself. We cannot rely on search
engines to filter for us.

I would like to know how quadsearch calculates the number of
citations. Many citation engines cannot quote from all publications
especially from conferences that are deemed to be low class
publications, but I prefer to quote from conferences and even internet
sources. They are more up to date and controversial.

It is refreshing that quadsearch is able to extract from google
scholar all citations for all types of articles. Google ranking tends
to be very subjective and highly filtered. For example, it takes into
account who the author is, and how old the publication was.

Since I am not active publishing articles since it is not my job and
it is costly to publish, I am not that well known. Theory is more than
20 years old and not much development had been published based on this
work but I have been developing it by myself comparing my results with
current state of the art in computer architectures.

Intelligence Theory was developed for computer architecture or more
oriented to organisation as current textbooks would like to call it
since it is hardware based. Many of my results shows that Intel and
other established computer developers are missing the whole point,
most probably because they have not approached the problem
scientifically, such as using Information Theory and therefore
Intelligence theory.

The adhoc, SPEC-mark style of measurements are still being used,
making optimal designs very difficult to do. I am trying to get
funding in order to publish more papers on this theory. In fact
campaigning to make Information Theory more acceptable to computer
scientists and architects/designers. It should also be easy to patents
many new designs based on IntelligenceTheory but it is a question of
whether it is worthwhile or not. How can we compete against multi-
billion dollar companies such as Intel and IBM?

I shall put the screen capture of the quadsearch result of my paper in
my blogspot, scientificintelligence.

I have to rename it as scientificintelligence because
intelligencetheory blogspot was taken by the multiple intelligences
theory group, which I call nonsense because of its impracticality.



From: "Norela Osman" Norela on 13 Jul 2010 07:58
Maybe your paper is hair brain and that is why it is treated as such.
"Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad" <othmana(a)lycos.com> wrote in message
news:1963d30a-2060-4ae7-b42e-67974ed69ac7(a)a4g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
> http://quadsearch.csd.auth.gr/ssearch.php?m=1&wtl=1&frop=501&lan=1&tos=2&pp=2&query=quantitative+measure+of+intelligence&query2=&sst=2&ResPerPage=500&frp_p=1&btn=1
>
> You have to search this quadsearch engine using the full article name.
> Otherwise it will not appear at all.
>
> I am surprised that my conference paper was cited more times than
> Multiple Intelligences theory, although google ranking is much much
> lower at 1.
>
> I had tried a few citation extracting engines. quadsearch is the third
> one that I tried. It does not search properly when I use my name. Even
> complete title search failed. You must make it a general search for
> all languages and subjects. If you narrow the search, it will fail.
> You must be willing to filter it yourself. We cannot rely on search
> engines to filter for us.
>
> I would like to know how quadsearch calculates the number of
> citations. Many citation engines cannot quote from all publications
> especially from conferences that are deemed to be low class
> publications, but I prefer to quote from conferences and even internet
> sources. They are more up to date and controversial.
>
> It is refreshing that quadsearch is able to extract from google
> scholar all citations for all types of articles. Google ranking tends
> to be very subjective and highly filtered. For example, it takes into
> account who the author is, and how old the publication was.
>
> Since I am not active publishing articles since it is not my job and
> it is costly to publish, I am not that well known. Theory is more than
> 20 years old and not much development had been published based on this
> work but I have been developing it by myself comparing my results with
> current state of the art in computer architectures.
>
> Intelligence Theory was developed for computer architecture or more
> oriented to organisation as current textbooks would like to call it
> since it is hardware based. Many of my results shows that Intel and
> other established computer developers are missing the whole point,
> most probably because they have not approached the problem
> scientifically, such as using Information Theory and therefore
> Intelligence theory.
>
> The adhoc, SPEC-mark style of measurements are still being used,
> making optimal designs very difficult to do. I am trying to get
> funding in order to publish more papers on this theory. In fact
> campaigning to make Information Theory more acceptable to computer
> scientists and architects/designers. It should also be easy to patents
> many new designs based on IntelligenceTheory but it is a question of
> whether it is worthwhile or not. How can we compete against multi-
> billion dollar companies such as Intel and IBM?
>
> I shall put the screen capture of the quadsearch result of my paper in
> my blogspot, scientificintelligence.
>
> I have to rename it as scientificintelligence because
> intelligencetheory blogspot was taken by the multiple intelligences
> theory group, which I call nonsense because of its impracticality.
>
>
>


From: Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad on 14 Jul 2010 09:21
On Jul 13, 7:58 pm, "Norela Osman" <Norela Os...(a)tmnet.net.my> wrote:
> Maybe your paper is hair brain and that is why it is treated as such.

It may be hair brain but there is no reason to lie about it, is there?

Unless they have something to hide.


> "Ir. Hj. Othman bin Hj. Ahmad" <othm...(a)lycos.com> wrote in messagenews:1963d30a-2060-4ae7-b42e-67974ed69ac7(a)a4g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
>
> >http://quadsearch.csd.auth.gr/ssearch.php?m=1&wtl=1&frop=501&lan=1&to...
>
> > You have to search this quadsearch engine using the full article name.
> > Otherwise it will not appear at all.
>
> > I am surprised that my conference paper was cited more times than
> > Multiple Intelligences theory, although google ranking is much much
> > lower at 1.
>
> > I had tried a few citation extracting engines. quadsearch is the third
> > one that I tried. It does not search properly when I use my name. Even
> > complete title search failed. You must make it a general search for
> > all languages and subjects. If you narrow the search, it will fail.
> > You must be willing to filter it yourself. We cannot rely on search
> > engines to filter for us.
>
> > I would like to know how quadsearch calculates the number of
> > citations. Many citation engines cannot quote from all publications
> > especially from conferences that are deemed to be low class
> > publications, but I prefer to quote from conferences and even internet
> > sources. They are more up to date and controversial.
>
> > It is refreshing that quadsearch is able to extract from google
> > scholar all citations for all types of articles. Google ranking tends
> > to be very subjective and highly filtered. For example, it takes into
> > account who the author is, and how old the publication was.
>
> > Since I am not active publishing articles since it is not my job and
> > it is costly to publish, I am not that well known. Theory is more than
> > 20 years old and not much development had been published based on this
> > work but I have been developing it by myself comparing my results with
> > current state of the art in computer architectures.
>
> > Intelligence Theory was developed for computer architecture or more
> > oriented to organisation as current textbooks would like to call it
> > since it is hardware based. Many of my results shows that Intel and
> > other established computer developers are missing the whole point,
> > most probably because they have not approached the problem
> > scientifically, such as using Information Theory and therefore
> > Intelligence theory.
>
> > The adhoc, SPEC-mark style of measurements are still being used,
> > making optimal designs very difficult to do. I am trying to get
> > funding in order to publish more papers on this theory. In fact
> > campaigning to make Information Theory more acceptable to computer
> > scientists and architects/designers. It should also be easy to patents
> > many new designs based on IntelligenceTheory but it is a question of
> > whether it is worthwhile or not. How can we compete against multi-
> > billion dollar companies such as Intel and IBM?
>
> > I shall put the screen capture of the quadsearch result of my paper in
> > my blogspot, scientificintelligence.
>
> > I have to rename it as scientificintelligence because
> > intelligencetheory blogspot was taken by the multiple intelligences
> > theory group, which I call nonsense because of its impracticality.

From: adchin on 15 Jul 2010 09:37
How many times people search for that link ( your article ) contributes
to its ranking going up and appearing in earlier pages of the search
engine, is also a factor that contributes why an article is in Page 1 or
Page 1,000, when you do a search.

Depending on how the link is associated to a search engine, if your name
is not part of the search, searching for your name will not help.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: BOSS Purse wholesaler (httpwww.cntrade09.com) - (paypal payment)
Next: Cheap Wholesale A&F Long Sleeve