Prev: Offered $10 discount by phone company, only got approx $9 dueto "GST"
Next: Phone warning for kids
From: SG1 on 28 Jun 2010 07:33

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88r9okFt9vU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> Swampfox wrote:
>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>> Swampfox wrote:
>>>> Mr.T wrote:
>>>>> "Swampfox" <noidea(a)whocares.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:4c248337$0$12922$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>> Well the projected total cost divided by the adult population,
>>>>>>> doesn't bode well for the income necessary to make it viable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Surely that's flawed.
>>>>>> What about business, government departments, research
>>>>>> establishments, hospitals etc.
>>>>>> Many businesses, especially large ones, already pay a premium for
>>>>>> fast and reliable communications and the possibilities would be
>>>>>> endless with a fibre network, all business telephony could be
>>>>>> handled for starters.
>>>>>
>>>>> So just a good case for the private enterprise Telco's to fund it
>>>>> then, NOT the taxpayer.
>>>>> And IF Telstra was still owned by the government we would have a
>>>>> problem of course. They had already planned to put in fibre to the
>>>>> home when practical, *before* it was even thought of being sold.
>>>>
>>>> That's a different matter, your projection, "total cost divided by
>>>> the adult population" is nowhere near the mark.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Just as fleet sales are vital for the motor industry business take
>>>>>> up would be vital for the NBN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bullshit, only a very small percentage of car models made are sold
>>>>> to fleets, or in a number that has ANY effect on price.
>>>>
>>>> In 2006 88% of Ford Falcons and 81% of Holden Commodores were sold
>>>> to fleet customers.
>>>
>>> Bullshit they were.
>
>> I'm sure you're across the figures better than a national motoring
>> magazine Rod.
>
> When they make such an outrageous claim, its up to THEM to substantiate
> that claim.
>
>> Is there anything you're not an authority on by the way?
>
> Pathetic.

I guess that is a yes.


From: Rod Speed on 28 Jun 2010 14:24
SG1 wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:88r9okFt9vU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> Swampfox wrote:
>>> Rod Speed wrote:
>>>> Swampfox wrote:
>>>>> Mr.T wrote:
>>>>>> "Swampfox" <noidea(a)whocares.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:4c248337$0$12922$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>>>>> Well the projected total cost divided by the adult population,
>>>>>>>> doesn't bode well for the income necessary to make it viable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Surely that's flawed.
>>>>>>> What about business, government departments, research
>>>>>>> establishments, hospitals etc.
>>>>>>> Many businesses, especially large ones, already pay a premium
>>>>>>> for fast and reliable communications and the possibilities
>>>>>>> would be endless with a fibre network, all business telephony
>>>>>>> could be handled for starters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So just a good case for the private enterprise Telco's to fund it
>>>>>> then, NOT the taxpayer.
>>>>>> And IF Telstra was still owned by the government we would have a
>>>>>> problem of course. They had already planned to put in fibre to
>>>>>> the home when practical, *before* it was even thought of being
>>>>>> sold.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a different matter, your projection, "total cost divided by
>>>>> the adult population" is nowhere near the mark.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just as fleet sales are vital for the motor industry business
>>>>>>> take up would be vital for the NBN.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bullshit, only a very small percentage of car models made are
>>>>>> sold to fleets, or in a number that has ANY effect on price.
>>>>>
>>>>> In 2006 88% of Ford Falcons and 81% of Holden Commodores were sold
>>>>> to fleet customers.
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit they were.
>>
>>> I'm sure you're across the figures better than a national motoring
>>> magazine Rod.
>>
>> When they make such an outrageous claim, its up to THEM to
>> substantiate that claim.
>>
>>> Is there anything you're not an authority on by the way?
>>
>> Pathetic.
>
> I guess that is a yes.

Pathetic.


From: Polly the Parrot on 28 Jun 2010 16:24
On 29/06/10 04:24, Rod Speed wrote:
>> > I guess that is a yes.
> Pathetic.
>
>
A pathetic Yes?

--
Worth viewing:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptccZze7VxQ
From: Rod Speed on 29 Jun 2010 06:11
Polly the Parrot wrote
> Rod Speed wrote

>>>> I guess that is a yes.

>> Pathetic.

> A pathetic Yes?

Nope.


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Offered $10 discount by phone company, only got approx $9 dueto "GST"
Next: Phone warning for kids