Prev: Any tips on structuring large expect scripts ?
Next: Help with freewrap
From: Pat Thoyts on 10 Apr 2005 17:15
ptw(a)rlsaxps.bnsc.rl.ac.uk (Pat Wallace) writes:
>
>In fact the tests didn't all work. Two of them failed:
>
[snip]
>==== expr-22.9 non-numeric floats: shared object equality and NaN FAILED
Yeah - don't worry about it. It means that the systems implementation
of sscanf doesn't understand NaN as a double.

[snip]
>
>==== filename-9.19.2 Tcl_JoinPath: win FAILED
[snip]
This one is new for me. Doesn't look terminal though.

>I'm now wondering whether I can install irrespective, or whether to start
>again using the previous Tcl/Tk version. Any advice?

Looks ok basically. I'd use it.

--
Pat Thoyts http://www.zsplat.freeserve.co.uk/resume.html
To reply, rot13 the return address or read the X-Address header.
PGP fingerprint 2C 6E 98 07 2C 59 C8 97 10 CE 11 E6 04 E0 B9 DD
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Any tips on structuring large expect scripts ?
Next: Help with freewrap