Parallel huffman encoding and decoding algorithm/idea by Skybuckfor sale !
|
Prev: Parallel huffman encoding and decoding algorithm/idea by Skybuck for sale !
Next: CFP: SMART'10 - 4th Workshop on Statistical and Machine learning approaches to ARchitecture and compilaTion
From: Ian Bell on 25 Sep 2009 06:58 Skybuck Flying wrote: > Hello, > > Today I invented a parallel huffman encoding and decoding algorithm which is > pretty much 100% parallel and very efficient. > > (For now this does not include parallel building of the tree, nor does it > include parallel huffman code building... just parallel encoding and > parallel decoding (which is 99.9% of the work-load probably)). > > I did a quick google and it's possibly not invented before. > > Interested parties can contact me via e-mail at: skybuck 2000 @ hotmail . > com > > I have two propositions for interested "buyers" of the idea: > > 1. You pay me one million euro's and I tell you my little secret ;) But > before I tell you my little secret you must have payed me the one million > euro's and signed a contract that I am exempt from any lawsuits, patents > fees or whatever. > > or > > 2. You pay me XX.000 euro's so that I can patent the invention. You shall > receive a "license" to the patent for a certain license fee... which could > be one big sum of money one time... or a steady small ammount of money for > each month or year or so. > > This deal will be worked out in a contract so that we both get what we want: > > You get the idea/technology or license/etc, I get lot's of money. > > I am pretty sure the idea works... I will probably make a prototype just to > prove to myself and any interested parties that it works. > > The whole deal will mostly be based on trust... you shall not have access to > source code or the idea's until payment and contract. > > Bye, > Skybuck. > > LOL. You won't get any takers for a deal like that. They'll happily sign a confidentiality agreement before looking at what you have got, but no one is going to part with any cash without seeing anything. Cheers ianb
From: Ken Hagan on 25 Sep 2009 07:04 I've invented the same idea, but I'm prepared to entertain offers of only half a million euros. (Same terms as Skybuck. I haven't built a prototype, I don't guarantee that it works, and I want your final payment up front before I divulge anything.)
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 25 Sep 2009 09:49 Skybuck Flying wrote: > "Ken Hagan" <K.Hagan(a)thermoteknix.com> wrote in message > news:op.u0s7qapqss38k4(a)khagan.ttx... >> I've invented the same idea, but I'm prepared to entertain offers of only >> half a million euros. (Same terms as Skybuck. I haven't built a prototype, >> I don't guarantee that it works, and I want your final payment up front >> before I divulge anything.) > > I, Skybuck, am in no way associated with Ken Hagan, therefore Ken Hagan has > no access to my idea's what so ever, so I highly doubt any of his claims. > > I, Skybuck, however am well known among newsgroups related to computer > technology and especially programming. > > I, Skybuck, have posted many "test programs" for the Delphi programming > language, which usually always worked. > > I, Skybuck, have also developed some software which can be tested/downloaded > from my website... google for UDP File Transfer or UDP Speed Test to see > some of my skills in action. That software is now rather old though... maybe > some day I will work on it some more. > > I, Skybuck, have invented/re-invented and implemented many many many many > many many many many algorithms so I am no stranger when it comes to > inventing algorithm and implementation algorithms. > > I, Skybuck, have a very good feeling which tells me if something/an > algorithm is going to work or not. > > The point I am trying to make is that I am very serious about my invention > and that I am good for it. > > When I say it's probably gonna work, then it's probably gonna work with > 99.99% probability. As good as 100%. > > However the proof is in the pudding as they say that's why I have 0.01% > doubts. > > The doubt is not if it's gonna work, the doubt is about what will the > performance be. > > Again my feeling says the performance will be high for large ammounts of > huffman encoding/decoding. > > Interested buyers might be wondering why there is no prototype and why I > would still like to sell something, it's quite simple really: > > 1. First of all I invented it today so I had no time to develop a prototype > yet, developing a prototype is something that costs time, time I could spent > on doing other things. > > 2. Second of all I might not be the best person in the world to implement > the brilliantly simple idea/algorithm. > > So a potential buyer could be a cpu or gpu manufacturer or a video codec > company or even a file compression company or even a game developer company > or even academic people doing research into parallel algorithms or anybody > else in the world that has experience, knowledge and skills when it comes to > "parallel computing". > > If you are already very good at parallel computing/programming then buying > this idea/algorithm from me could be very interesting for you (and your > company if there is a company) ! > > After all these years of programming myself I know when I hit gold... and > this could be a big mine of gold just waiting for you to be mined/exploited. > > For big companies with lot's of money and businness and market share at > stake I would urge them to seriously consider what I am proposing... for big > companies what I am asking for is really not that much... and for them it > gives them a piece of mind... > > "We don't have to worry about Skybuck's invention anymore". > > "We have it, we know it, we got it, we "own" it (license, maybe even > exclusive !), we can do with it whatever we want". > > "We don't have to worry about competitors snatching it in front of our eyes > and laughing in our faces !". > > "We can exclude the competitors from this technology by purchasing an > exclusive license !". > > "We have this fresh piece of technology, it's gonna make as look funky !" > > "It's going to make our chips and/or software incredibly fast when it comes > to huffman encoding/decoding <- a very nice property to have !". > > Is that the sound of money ringing ? I can almost feel the money raining on > my hands ! =D > > You know what to do, contact me, skybuck, at: > > skybuck 2000 @ hotmail . com > > Better be safe than sorry ! ;) > > Bye, > Skybuck =D > > I prefer Hagan's offer. -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff
From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 25 Sep 2009 12:40
Rich the Cynic wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:58:30 +0100, Ian Bell wrote: >> Skybuck Flying wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Today I invented a parallel huffman encoding and decoding algorithm which is >>> pretty much 100% parallel and very efficient. >> LOL. You won't get any takers for a deal like that. They'll happily sign >> a confidentiality agreement before looking at what you have got, but no >> one is going to part with any cash without seeing anything. >> >> Cheers >> > Today I invented a device for transportation. It's called the "wheel". > Just send me five kazillion dollars, and you can be the first on the > patent gravy train! I have a device for allowing people to walk through walls... -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.theconsensus.org/ - A UK political party http://www.onetribe.me.uk/wordpress/?cat=5 - Our podcasts on weird stuff |