Prev: Testing Postfix EECDH support with OpenSSL 1.0.0
Next: Virtual domains (more)
From: Wietse Venema on 1 Jun 2010 20:30
I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental"
and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1 "stable".

Both versions have the same fixes/workarounds for incompatible
changes in MacOS 10.6, OpenSSL 1.0.0, and Berkeley DB 5.0.21,
which were contributed from various places.

At the moment I either don't have these systems or I don't use them
enough to make a convincing test case, so it would be good if some
people can confirm that the changes are integrated properly.

Wietse

From: Matt Hayes on 1 Jun 2010 20:48
On 06/01/2010 08:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental"
> and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1 "stable".
>
> Both versions have the same fixes/workarounds for incompatible
> changes in MacOS 10.6, OpenSSL 1.0.0, and Berkeley DB 5.0.21,
> which were contributed from various places.
>
> At the moment I either don't have these systems or I don't use them
> enough to make a convincing test case, so it would be good if some
> people can confirm that the changes are integrated properly.
>
> Wietse

Wietse,

Do you by chance have the CHANGELOG and RELEASE_NOTES for the latest 2.8
snapshot release?

-Matt

From: Sahil Tandon on 1 Jun 2010 20:50
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, Matt Hayes wrote:

> On 06/01/2010 08:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental"
> > and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1 "stable".
> >
> > Both versions have the same fixes/workarounds for incompatible
> > changes in MacOS 10.6, OpenSSL 1.0.0, and Berkeley DB 5.0.21,
> > which were contributed from various places.
> >
> > At the moment I either don't have these systems or I don't use them
> > enough to make a convincing test case, so it would be good if some
> > people can confirm that the changes are integrated properly.
>
> Do you by chance have the CHANGELOG and RELEASE_NOTES for the latest 2.8
> snapshot release?

Change log/History is here:

ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/postfix-2.8-20100601.HISTORY

--
Sahil Tandon <sahil(a)FreeBSD.org>

From: Matt Hayes on 1 Jun 2010 20:54
On 06/01/2010 08:50 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jun 2010, Matt Hayes wrote:
>
>> On 06/01/2010 08:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>>> I just uploaded new versions of Postfix 2.8-20100601 "experimental"
>>> and a release candidate for Postfix 2.7.1 "stable".
>>>
>>> Both versions have the same fixes/workarounds for incompatible
>>> changes in MacOS 10.6, OpenSSL 1.0.0, and Berkeley DB 5.0.21,
>>> which were contributed from various places.
>>>
>>> At the moment I either don't have these systems or I don't use them
>>> enough to make a convincing test case, so it would be good if some
>>> people can confirm that the changes are integrated properly.
>>
>> Do you by chance have the CHANGELOG and RELEASE_NOTES for the latest 2.8
>> snapshot release?
>
> Change log/History is here:
>
> ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/experimental/postfix-2.8-20100601.HISTORY
>


Oh duH! Thanks Sahil.. didn't even think to check the actual ftp site!

Loooong day :)

-Matt

From: Jim Wright on 2 Jun 2010 23:58
OS X 10.6.3, attempting to build 2.7.1-RC1:

(snip)
In file included from dns_lookup.c:152:
dns.h:26:28: error: nameser_compat.h: No such file or directory
make: *** [dns_lookup.o] Error 1
make: *** [update] Error 1


In my 2.7 build, I referenced this file: arpa/nameser_compat.h


Jim


On Jun 1, 2010, at 7:30 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:

> At the moment I either don't have these systems or I don't use them
> enough to make a convincing test case, so it would be good if some
> people can confirm that the changes are integrated properly.

 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Testing Postfix EECDH support with OpenSSL 1.0.0
Next: Virtual domains (more)