Prev: FAQ 7.19 What's the difference between deep and shallow binding?
Next: Newbie: Where to get support for basic Perl problem?
From: Ralph Malph on 18 Jun 2010 13:24
Full Text:
-No spam.
-If asking about code post a complete sample that can run on
its own and demonstrates the problem.
-Be nice to everyone including newbies. Don't question design
decisions too hard. That would contradict TMTOWTDI.
From: Keith Keller on 18 Jun 2010 17:39
On 2010-06-18, Ralph Malph <ralph(a)happydays.com> wrote:
> Full Text:
> -No spam.
> -If asking about code post a complete sample that can run on
> its own and demonstrates the problem.
> -Be nice to everyone including newbies. Don't question design
> decisions too hard. That would contradict TMTOWTDI.

If the sole criterion for improvement is length, 2.0 is far superior to
1.9.

If there are any other criteria, 1.9 is far superior to 2.0.

--keith


--
kkeller-usenet(a)wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
(try just my userid to email me)
AOLSFAQ=http://www.therockgarden.ca/aolsfaq.txt
see X- headers for PGP signature information

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: FAQ 7.19 What's the difference between deep and shallow binding?
Next: Newbie: Where to get support for basic Perl problem?