From: David Schwartz on
On Jul 15, 4:50 am, "R.Wieser" <addr...(a)not.available> wrote:

> Wrong month and day of week (*thursday*, *july* 15). :-)

Sorry, you're right.

> A question though : where did you get that 50,000,000 from, and which
> epoch(s) did you take ?

The 50,000,000 I pulled out of my butt. I used the Unix epoch,
1/1/1970.

DS
From: R.Wieser on
Hello David,

> > Wrong month and day of week (*thursday*, *july* 15). :-)

> Sorry, you're right.

Hey, at least you did try. Thanks for that.

> The 50,000,000 I pulled out of my butt.

I tried that (and several things) too, but it would not cooperate.

> I used the Unix epoch, 1/1/1970.

Thanks.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


-- Origional message:
David Schwartz <davids(a)webmaster.com> schreef in berichtnieuws
b11ce514-a2d5-43c3-82c3-c588e10247c5(a)u36g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 15, 4:50 am, "R.Wieser" <addr...(a)not.available> wrote:

> Wrong month and day of week (*thursday*, *july* 15). :-)

Sorry, you're right.

> A question though : where did you get that 50,000,000 from, and which
> epoch(s) did you take ?

The 50,000,000 I pulled out of my butt. I used the Unix epoch,
1/1/1970.

DS


From: David Schwartz on
On Jul 16, 4:38 am, "R.Wieser" <addr...(a)not.available> wrote:

> Hey, at least you did try.  Thanks for that.

Get at least two more timestamps and their equivalent time. If the
difference between the timestamp numbers is proportional to the
difference between the seconds since the epoch, you'll have your
answer immediately.

DS
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: debug
Next: Wordwrap a multiline edit control