Question about constructor property vs. instanceof
in [JavaScript]
|
Prev: How to link CSS(s) already linked to parent frame into child iframe using javascript
Next: Error getElementbyClassName
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 19 Jan 2010 13:50 John G Harris wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> John G Harris wrote: >>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>> John G Harris wrote: >>>>> Javascript is more flexible. >>>> There is no "Javascript", [...] >>> >>> Yes there is, but only at the beginning of sentences (in English). >> >>Nonsense. Please get yourself informed: >> >><http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> > > 'javascript' is the name of a class of languages : all those languages > that include ECMAScript or something very close to it. It is _not_ "the name"; it is potentially misleading term used in a made-up definition that I do not support. PointedEars -- Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript. -- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300dec7(a)news.demon.co.uk>
From: John G Harris on 20 Jan 2010 10:40 On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 at 19:50:34, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >John G Harris wrote: <snip> >> 'javascript' is the name of a class of languages : all those languages >> that include ECMAScript or something very close to it. > >It is _not_ "the name"; it is potentially misleading term used in a made-up >definition that I do not support. No-one is asking you to support it. You are, however, not permitted to stop other people supporting it. John -- John Harris
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on 20 Jan 2010 19:33 John G Harris wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> John G Harris wrote: >>> 'javascript' is the name of a class of languages : all those languages >>> that include ECMAScript or something very close to it. >> >> It is _not_ "the name"; it is potentially misleading term used in a >> made-up definition that I do not support. > > No-one is asking you to support it. You are, however, not permitted to > stop other people supporting it. Is twisting somebody else's words customary at demon.co.uk or are you Stockton's alter ego after all? Score adjusted PointedEars -- Prototype.js was written by people who don't know javascript for people who don't know javascript. People who don't know javascript are not the best source of advice on designing systems that use javascript. -- Richard Cornford, cljs, <f806at$ail$1$8300dec7(a)news.demon.co.uk>
From: John G Harris on 21 Jan 2010 09:27
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 at 01:33:39, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >John G Harris wrote: > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> John G Harris wrote: >>>> 'javascript' is the name of a class of languages : all those languages >>>> that include ECMAScript or something very close to it. >>> >>> It is _not_ "the name"; it is potentially misleading term used in a >>> made-up definition that I do not support. >> >> No-one is asking you to support it. You are, however, not permitted to >> stop other people supporting it. > >Is twisting somebody else's words customary at demon.co.uk or are you >Stockton's alter ego after all? No, no. I'm simulating Pointed Ears. >Score adjusted Success ! John -- John Harris |