From: Nagaraj Shyam on
Test results inline as the mailserver pulled out the attachment. Please
read the first post about the thread to get context.



===========================================samba test
results=================================================================

test: ACLS

TESTING SETFILEINFO EA_SET

add a new ACE to the DACL

torture/raw/acls.c:111: security descriptors don't match!

got:

expected:

remove it again

testing nttrans create with sec_desc

creating normal file

querying ACL

adding a new ACE

creating a file with an initial ACL

torture/raw/acls.c:224: security descriptors don't match!

got:

expected:

TESTING SEC_DESC WITH A NULL DACL

creating a file with a empty sd

get the original sd

set NULL DACL

(torture/raw/acls.c:325) Incorrect status NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY - should
be

NT_STATUS_OK

TESTING SID_CREATOR_OWNER

get the original sd

set a sec desc allowing no write by CREATOR_OWNER

try open for write

(torture/raw/acls.c:562) Incorrect status NT_STATUS_OK - should be

NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

TESTING FILE GENERIC BITS

get the original sd

smblsa_sid_check_privilege - NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND

SEC_PRIV_RESTORE - No

smblsa_sid_check_privilege - NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND

SEC_PRIV_TAKE_OWNERSHIP - No

testing generic bits 0x00000000

torture/raw/acls.c:840: security descriptors don't match!

got:

expected:

(torture/raw/acls.c:852) Incorrect access_flags 0x00170089 - should be

0x00070080

TESTING FILE OWNER BITS

get the original sd

smblsa_sid_check_privilege - NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND

SEC_PRIV_RESTORE - No

smblsa_sid_check_privilege - NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND

SEC_PRIV_TAKE_OWNERSHIP - No

open succeeded with access mask 0x00000001 of expected 0x00000082 -
should fail

(torture/raw/acls.c:1189) Incorrect status NT_STATUS_OK - should be

NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

TESTING ACL INHERITANCE

get the original sd

owner_sid is S-1-5-21-385505261-2069261775-1913586636-500

Expected default sd:

at 0 - got:

Expected default sd for dir at 0:

got:

Bad sd in child file at 1

(0) Bad sd in child dir at 1 (parent 0x1)

Expected default sd:

at 2 - got:

(CI) Bad sd in child dir at 2 (parent 0x2)

Bad sd in child file at 3

(CI) Bad sd in child dir at 3 (parent 0x3)

Expected default sd:

at 4 - got:

Expected default sd for dir at 4:

got:

Bad sd in child file at 5

Expected default sd for dir at 5:

got:

Expected default sd:

at 6 - got:

(CI & NP) Bad sd in child dir at 6 (parent 0x6)

Bad sd in child file at 7

(CI & NP) Bad sd in child dir at 7 (parent 0x7)

Expected default sd:

at 8 - got:

Expected default sd for dir at 8:

got:

Bad sd in child file at 9

(0) Bad sd in child dir at 9 (parent 0x9)

Expected default sd:

at 10 - got:

(CI) Bad sd in child dir at 10 (parent 0xa)

Bad sd in child file at 11

(CI) Bad sd in child dir at 11 (parent 0xb)

Expected default sd:

at 12 - got:

Expected default sd for dir at 12:

got:

Bad sd in child file at 13

Expected default sd for dir at 13:

got:

Expected default sd:

at 14 - got:

(CI & NP) Bad sd in child dir at 14 (parent 0xe)

Bad sd in child file at 15

(CI & NP) Bad sd in child dir at 15 (parent 0xf)

testing access checks on inherited create with
\testsd\inheritance\testfile

torture/raw/acls.c:1558: security descriptors don't match!

got:

expected:

failed: w2k3 ACL bug (allowed open when ACL should deny)

trying without execute

(torture/raw/acls.c:1583) Incorrect status NT_STATUS_OK - should be

NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

TESTING DYNAMIC ACL INHERITANCE

get the original sd

owner_sid is S-1-5-21-385505261-2069261775-1913586636-500

create a file with an inherited acl

try and access file with base rights - should be OK

try and access file with extra rights - should be denied

(torture/raw/acls.c:1723) Incorrect status NT_STATUS_OK - should be

NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED

put back original sd

TESTING ACCESS MASKS FOR SD GET/SET

(torture/raw/acls.c:1865) Incorrect status NT_STATUS_INVALID_OWNER -
should be

NT_STATUS_OK

error: ACLS [

Unknown error/failure

]



======================================================w23k test
results====================================================

test: ACLS

TESTING SETFILEINFO EA_SET

add a new ACE to the DACL

remove it again

testing nttrans create with sec_desc

creating normal file

querying ACL

adding a new ACE

creating a file with an initial ACL

TESTING SEC_DESC WITH A NULL DACL

creating a file with a empty sd

get the original sd

set NULL DACL

get the sd

try open for read control

try open for write

try open for read

try open for generic write

try open for generic read

set DACL with 0 aces

get the sd

try open for read control

try open for write => access_denied

try open for read => access_denied

try open for generic write => access_denied

try open for generic read => access_denied

set empty sd

get the sd

TESTING SID_CREATOR_OWNER

get the original sd

set a sec desc allowing no write by CREATOR_OWNER

try open for write

try open for read

try open for generic write

try open for generic read

set a sec desc allowing no write by owner

check that sd has been mapped correctly

try open for write

try open for read

try open for generic write

try open for generic read

set a sec desc allowing generic read by owner

check that generic read has been mapped correctly

try open for write

try open for read

try open for generic write

try open for generic read

put back original sd

TESTING FILE GENERIC BITS

get the original sd

SEC_PRIV_RESTORE - Yes

SEC_PRIV_TAKE_OWNERSHIP - Yes

testing generic bits 0x00000000

testing generic bits 0x00000000 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x80000000

testing generic bits 0x80000000 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x40000000

testing generic bits 0x40000000 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x20000000

testing generic bits 0x20000000 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x10000000

testing generic bits 0x10000000 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x00000001

testing generic bits 0x00000001 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x00000080

testing generic bits 0x00000080 (anonymous)

put back original sd

TESTING DIR GENERIC BITS

get the original sd

SEC_PRIV_RESTORE - Yes

SEC_PRIV_TAKE_OWNERSHIP - Yes

testing generic bits 0x00000000

testing generic bits 0x00000000 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x80000000

testing generic bits 0x80000000 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x40000000

testing generic bits 0x40000000 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x20000000

testing generic bits 0x20000000 (anonymous)

testing generic bits 0x10000000

testing generic bits 0x10000000 (anonymous)

put back original sd

TESTING FILE OWNER BITS

get the original sd

SEC_PRIV_RESTORE - Yes

SEC_PRIV_TAKE_OWNERSHIP - Yes

put back original sd

TESTING ACL INHERITANCE

get the original sd

owner_sid is S-1-5-32-544

testing access checks on inherited create with
\testsd\inheritance\testfile

failed: w2k3 ACL bug (allowed open when ACL should deny)

trying without execute

and with full permissions again

put back original sd

TESTING DYNAMIC ACL INHERITANCE

get the original sd

owner_sid is S-1-5-32-544

create a file with an inherited acl

try and access file with base rights - should be OK

try and access file with extra rights - should be denied

update parent sd

try and access file with base rights - should be OK

try and access now - should be OK if dynamic inheritance works

Server does not have dynamic inheritance

put back original sd

TESTING ACCESS MASKS FOR SD GET/SET

error: ACLS [

Unknown error/failure

]







From: Nagaraj Shyam
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 11:26 AM
To: 'samba(a)lists.samba.org'
Subject: RAW_ACLS smbtorture test



Hi All,



I wanted to check the state of the ACL evaluation engine in samba. I
have configured my linux sles 10, samba version 3.5.1-3.3-2332 with "ea
support = yes", "store dos attributes=yes", "vfs objects = acl_xattr"
and get lots of error + some failure messages.

I attached the results of running the test against both samba as well as
native windows 2003 cifs server.



Finally the test itself seems to error out.



Are there known issues in the samba acl evaluation engine? Is it being
worked on?



Thank you for any information/suggestions.



Regards.

-Shyam



--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba