From: Stefan Behnel on 16 May 2010 03:21 Martin v. Loewis, 16.05.2010 09:07: >> the approach that the OP is apparently trying to follow is >> clearly misguided. > > I completely agree. However, I recommend that we let him find out on his > own. I suspect he has some idiomatic usage of XML, perhaps with all > namespace prefixes defined in the root element. He'll find out that his > approach is flawed in the general case when he encounters such a case. > It's probably pointless trying to convince him in the abstract. Probably, yes. It's just that I prefer it if broken code doesn't get written in the first place, rather than having to fix it later on, which in this case even seems to imply breaking a user visible feature. But you're right, let's leave the decision to the OP. Stefan
From: Martin v. Loewis on 16 May 2010 05:05 > Maybe true technically, but false in practice. If I receive XML data > from source XYZ or service XYZ the use of namespaces and their prefixes > is extremely consistent [in practice] and very customary (for example: > I've never seen the DSML namespace abbreviated as anything other than > "dsml" and I rarely see WebDAV propfind XML use a namespace prefix other > than "D"). The odds that a customer or vendors ERP will generate > different namespaces and abbreviations between requests is ludicrously > remote [I don't recall ever seeing it happen]. In that case, you could also hard-code all prefixes in your application; no need to traverse the input document. Regards, Martin
From: Stefan Behnel on 16 May 2010 11:55 Martin v. Loewis, 16.05.2010 11:05: >> Maybe true technically, but false in practice. If I receive XML data >> from source XYZ or service XYZ the use of namespaces and their prefixes >> is extremely consistent [in practice] and very customary (for example: >> I've never seen the DSML namespace abbreviated as anything other than >> "dsml" and I rarely see WebDAV propfind XML use a namespace prefix other >> than "D"). The odds that a customer or vendors ERP will generate >> different namespaces and abbreviations between requests is ludicrously >> remote [I don't recall ever seeing it happen]. > > In that case, you could also hard-code all prefixes in your application; > no need to traverse the input document. +1. Hard-coding the prefixes is the best way to make the interface of your code consistent and predictable. Stefan
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Pyinstaller on WINE - cannot install pywin32 Next: Access to comp.lang.python |