Prev: error
Next: Automake Conditional and ARG_VAR Question
From: James Kanze on 29 Apr 2010 12:30
On Apr 28, 8:20 pm, sc...(a)slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) wrote:
> James Kanze <james.ka...(a)gmail.com> writes:
> >On Apr 28, 10:56 am, =D6=F6 Tiib <oot...(a)hot.ee> wrote:
> >> On Apr 28, 12:17 pm, boltar2...(a)boltar.world wrote:

[...]
> >It's normally no problem to get the address of the stack in C or
> >C++; just take the address of a local variable. (This isn't
> >guaranteed by the standard, of course, which doesn't even
> >guarantee that there is a stack, per se.) What that address
> >means, and what information you can deduce from it, is very
> >implementation specific, but for a given platform, you can often
> >determine something. (I've written stack walkback routines for
> >a number of platforms in C++. The code for one platform doesn't
> >work on other platforms, but it's still C++.)

> GCC/G++/GLIBC has this built-in now:

G++ has had it for some time now, I think. But I had originally
implemented the code for VC++ and Sun CC, and I'm not sure that
g++ supported it when I originally wrote the code. Were I doing
it today, I'd certainly use the g++ function for the g++
versions of the code.

--
James Kanze
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: error
Next: Automake Conditional and ARG_VAR Question