Selector for content?
in [CSS]
|
Prev: Can I refer width value not to the parent container cascade but to the current top browser window?
Next: b or strong?
From: dorayme on 5 Feb 2010 05:02 In article <edc8ce19-5265-4eaa-9f2d-9e9586ee21bb(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.co m>, Karsten Wutzke <kwutzke(a)web.de> wrote: > On 4 Feb., 23:37, dorayme <doraymeRidT...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > > In article > > <ef01ebd2-06c5-43ff-9b4c-18e7cdef3...(a)u41g2000yqe.googlegroups.co > > m>, > > Karsten Wutzke <kwut...(a)web.de> wrote: > > > > > does CSS have a selector that allows the selection of content? I want > > > to syntax highlight specific keywords in my pre and code tags, ideally > > > operators, numerics, strings, and comments, too. > > > > No. > > > > -- > > dorayme > > :-) I love concise answers. > > So using spans is the only pure HTML/CSS way to go? > Or perhaps em, depends on what you want to be saying, as it were. You know, it is not so hard to stick these element tags in if you know in advance what they are for, using Find and Replace, maybe even a bit of GREP. And as for the markup being being hard to read, well, mark-up does not have to be very beautiful. And, it might be that its beauty is enhanced in fact and that you need to reassess the aesthetics in this matter. Form married to function is an intoxicating and exciting cocktail... Go forth young man and think sideways and <b>ly. <g> -- dorayme
From: rf on 5 Feb 2010 05:19 "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:doraymeRidThis-F526EF.21021605022010(a)news.albasani.net... > Go forth young man and think sideways and <b>ly. <g> dorayme of here you are in gravely danger to be splitting an <i>nf<i>n<i>t<i>ve.
From: Karsten Wutzke on 5 Feb 2010 08:01 On 5 Feb., 11:19, "rf" <r...(a)z.invalid> wrote: > "dorayme" <doraymeRidT...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message > > news:doraymeRidThis-F526EF.21021605022010(a)news.albasani.net... > > > Go forth young man and think sideways and <b>ly. <g> > Hehe I'm not THAT young anymore, but thanks for the technical info :o) Karsten
From: Harlan Messinger on 5 Feb 2010 21:40 Karsten Wutzke wrote: > On 5 Feb., 11:19, "rf" <r...(a)z.invalid> wrote: >> "dorayme" <doraymeRidT...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message >> >> news:doraymeRidThis-F526EF.21021605022010(a)news.albasani.net... >> >>> Go forth young man and think sideways and <b>ly. <g> > > Hehe I'm not THAT young anymore, but thanks for the technical info :o) > It's just as well. Suppose you could use CSS to specify boldface for the keyword "int", and you found it bolding the "int" in "print", "tint", and "intention".
From: dorayme on 5 Feb 2010 22:28
In article <7t435dFhjpU1(a)mid.individual.net>, Harlan Messinger <hm.usenetremoverthis(a)gavelcade.com> wrote: > Karsten Wutzke wrote: > > On 5 Feb., 11:19, "rf" <r...(a)z.invalid> wrote: > >> "dorayme" <doraymeRidT...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in message > >> > >> news:doraymeRidThis-F526EF.21021605022010(a)news.albasani.net... > >> > >>> Go forth young man and think sideways and <b>ly. <g> > > > > Hehe I'm not THAT young anymore, but thanks for the technical info :o) > > > > It's just as well. Suppose you could use CSS to specify boldface for the > keyword "int", and you found it bolding the "int" in "print", "tint", > and "intention". Well, just as that would be something to watch out for when making your F&R/GREP pattern, it would presumably be something you would be able to watch out for and cope in the possible world where one could style for keywords. Possible worlds are many and some of them would be very sophisticated. -- dorayme |