Slack faq-o-matic
in [Slackware]
|
From: notbob on 29 Apr 2010 10:03 Hey! Whuh happened to Keith Keller's slack faq-o-matic. I was gonna direct that poster with the MARK question to it, but his SF server is dead. That was a great resource. nb
From: Sylvain Robitaille on 29 Apr 2010 11:29 notbob wrote: > Hey! Whuh happened to Keith Keller's slack faq-o-matic. I was gonna > direct that poster with the MARK question to it, but his SF server is > dead. That was a great resource. No disprespect meant to Keith, or the good intentions behind his AOLS faq-o-matic, but it was rather horrible (at least to use or even just look at). I can understand that you might have missed the original discussion that took place ... um ... back in 2006, I think, but I find it hard to imagine that you might not have seen the periodic posts every ... what is it? 10 days? ... every 10 days since Keith agreed to let others take over the newsgroup FAQ in a form external to faq-o-matic. If you check that periodic posting, you'll find pointers to the new-improved-aols-faq, and an HTML-ized version of the new-improved-aols-faq ... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Sylvain Robitaille syl(a)encs.concordia.ca Systems analyst / AITS Concordia University Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science Montreal, Quebec, Canada ----------------------------------------------------------------------
From: notbob on 29 Apr 2010 12:42 On 2010-04-29, Sylvain Robitaille <syl(a)alcor.concordia.ca> wrote: > faq-o-matic, but it was rather horrible (at least to use or even just > look at). Agreed. It WAS pretty hideous. ;) > hard to imagine that you might not have seen the periodic posts Yeah, I've seen them, but I'm pretty brain dead. I was just curious about Keith's faq. Thanks for the update, Sylvain. nb
From: Mike Jones on 29 Apr 2010 13:18 Responding to Sylvain Robitaille: > notbob wrote: > >> Hey! Whuh happened to Keith Keller's slack faq-o-matic. I was gonna >> direct that poster with the MARK question to it, but his SF server is >> dead. That was a great resource. > > No disprespect meant to Keith, or the good intentions behind his AOLS > faq-o-matic, but it was rather horrible (at least to use or even just > look at). > > I can understand that you might have missed the original discussion that > took place ... um ... back in 2006, I think, but I find it hard to > imagine that you might not have seen the periodic posts every ... what > is it? 10 days? ... every 10 days since Keith agreed to let others take > over the newsgroup FAQ in a form external to faq-o-matic. If you check > that periodic posting, you'll find pointers to the > new-improved-aols-faq, and an HTML-ized version of the > new-improved-aols-faq ... What? The FAQ? I'll get me coat... -- *=( http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/ *=( For all your UK news needs.
From: Mikhail Zotov on 1 May 2010 09:32 On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:03:08 GMT notbob <notbob(a)nothome.com> wrote: > Hey! Whuh happened to Keith Keller's slack faq-o-matic. I was gonna > direct that poster with the MARK question to it, but his SF server is > dead. That was a great resource. I can send you a copy dated back to March 2005. If Keith isn't against ;-) -- Mikhail
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Change interval for -- MARK -- entries Next: mysqld problem |