From: Helmut Meukel on
Hermann,

right, double logarithmic means something else:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppelt-logarithmische_Auftragung

Right now I don't have any idea, but to find an anwer I have do go
back in time to my highschool math, more than 40 years. I never
needed logarithms later in my life. <bg>
Maybe I come up with something after a good nights sleep.

Helmut.

"hermann leinen" <h.leinen(a)gmx.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:uXW1tfYsKHA.3908(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
> Helmut, do you have any idea how I can make it so that the smaller values take
> up more space in the slider?
>
> Right now it is so that when the slider is at the middle position, I am at the
> "real" value "71".
> I am thinking about a way how to make it let's say "30" only when I'm in the
> middle position.
> I have no idea which alogrithm I should use.
> I think "double logarithmic" means something else, right?
>
> Greetings
> Hermann
>
>
> Am 19.02.2010 13:48, schrieb Helmut Meukel:
>>
>> "MikeD" <nobody(a)nowhere.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>> news:epYiytVsKHA.5940(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>
>>>
>>> "hermann leinen" <h.leinen(a)gmx.de> wrote in message
>>> news:u#YVGSUsKHA.4752(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>> I have a slider that should accept values from 5 to 5000.
>>>> Since this cannot really be done by .Min and .Max, I have made it so
>>>> that the slider values are internally converted into a logarithmic
>>>> scale like this:
>>>>
>>>> This works great: When the slider is in the middle, it tells me that
>>>> value is 71, that is exactely what I wanted.
>>>
>>> What do you mean it can't be done? How is a value of 71 in the middle
>>> of a range that's 5 - 5000 (or even 1000 as you used for Max in your
>>> code)?
>>>
>>> Are you using the Slider from Windows Common Controls? It's Min and
>>> Max (and other related properties) are Long data types. This code
>>> works fine:
>>>
>>> Slider1.Min = 0
>>> Slider1.Max = 100000
>>> Slider1.Value = 50000
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mike
>>>
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> his scale is logarithmic, like the Richter scale for earthquakes.
>> The force of an earthquake with 5.0 is 10 times that of an earthquake
>> with 4.0
>>
>> If in his case the actual values are from 5 to 5000, you could simply
>> scale from 0 to 3:
>> 5 = 5 * 10^0 ==> 0
>> 50 = 5 * 10^1 ==> 1
>> 500 = 5 * 10^2 ==> 2
>> 5000 = 5 * 10^3 ==> 3
>> Or use an offset to make it more complicated, as he does.
>>
>> On a logarithmic scale, doubling the real value shows always an increase
>> of the
>> scale value of about 0.3.
>> With an linear scale as you suggested, you will see no change of the
>> slider position
>> if the value doubled from 50 to 100.
>>
>> Helmut.
>>
>>
>>
>

From: hermann leinen on
Hi Helmut,

thank you for thinking with me, but I think it's not necessary anymore...
I have hardcoded this ugly thing now because it doesn't have to be dynamic.

Greetings,
Hermann

Am 19.02.2010 20:02, schrieb Helmut Meukel:
> Hermann,
>
> right, double logarithmic means something else:
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppelt-logarithmische_Auftragung
>
> Right now I don't have any idea, but to find an anwer I have do go
> back in time to my highschool math, more than 40 years. I never
> needed logarithms later in my life. <bg>
> Maybe I come up with something after a good nights sleep.
>
> Helmut.
>
> "hermann leinen" <h.leinen(a)gmx.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:uXW1tfYsKHA.3908(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>> Helmut, do you have any idea how I can make it so that the smaller
>> values take up more space in the slider?
>>
>> Right now it is so that when the slider is at the middle position, I
>> am at the "real" value "71".
>> I am thinking about a way how to make it let's say "30" only when I'm
>> in the middle position.
>> I have no idea which alogrithm I should use.
>> I think "double logarithmic" means something else, right?
>>
>> Greetings
>> Hermann
>>
>>
>> Am 19.02.2010 13:48, schrieb Helmut Meukel:
>>>
>>> "MikeD" <nobody(a)nowhere.edu> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>> news:epYiytVsKHA.5940(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "hermann leinen" <h.leinen(a)gmx.de> wrote in message
>>>> news:u#YVGSUsKHA.4752(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>>> I have a slider that should accept values from 5 to 5000.
>>>>> Since this cannot really be done by .Min and .Max, I have made it so
>>>>> that the slider values are internally converted into a logarithmic
>>>>> scale like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> This works great: When the slider is in the middle, it tells me that
>>>>> value is 71, that is exactely what I wanted.
>>>>
>>>> What do you mean it can't be done? How is a value of 71 in the middle
>>>> of a range that's 5 - 5000 (or even 1000 as you used for Max in your
>>>> code)?
>>>>
>>>> Are you using the Slider from Windows Common Controls? It's Min and
>>>> Max (and other related properties) are Long data types. This code
>>>> works fine:
>>>>
>>>> Slider1.Min = 0
>>>> Slider1.Max = 100000
>>>> Slider1.Value = 50000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> his scale is logarithmic, like the Richter scale for earthquakes.
>>> The force of an earthquake with 5.0 is 10 times that of an earthquake
>>> with 4.0
>>>
>>> If in his case the actual values are from 5 to 5000, you could simply
>>> scale from 0 to 3:
>>> 5 = 5 * 10^0 ==> 0
>>> 50 = 5 * 10^1 ==> 1
>>> 500 = 5 * 10^2 ==> 2
>>> 5000 = 5 * 10^3 ==> 3
>>> Or use an offset to make it more complicated, as he does.
>>>
>>> On a logarithmic scale, doubling the real value shows always an increase
>>> of the
>>> scale value of about 0.3.
>>> With an linear scale as you suggested, you will see no change of the
>>> slider position
>>> if the value doubled from 50 to 100.
>>>
>>> Helmut.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: error line source code
Next: Resolved: Re: Slider math