From: Tim Daneliuk on
On 4/22/2010 6:09 PM, Indi wrote:
> On 2010-04-22, Tim Daneliuk <tundra(a)tundraware.com> wrote:
>>
>> There was essentially nothing commercially available that could have
>> done what was needed at the time Win 1.x was released.
>
> That's very silly. Win 1.x was a huge failure, and no-one used it.
> By the time windows became semi-usable there was OS/2 -- a *vastly*
> superior OS. I know you claim you were there and all but it seems to
> me you don't really know your history.
>

A fair point, but OS/2 wasn't truly a GUI driven environment and THAT
was the future, for better or worse. (I use GUIs to run multiple
xterms ;)

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk tundra(a)tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/