TaskSpeed results for My Library
in [JavaScript]
|
From: jdalton on 27 Jan 2010 16:31 Hi David, > A what request? http://github.com/guides/pull-requests http://github.com/phiggins42/taskspeed > You babbled a few generalizations, but didn't really say anything specific It shows that while you call others incompetent they cover more bugs/ spec than your own work. > I don't need to test any of their bullshit at all. You should, it helps point out the holes in your library. > Uh, no. You clearly don't understand how they work. It's more than a switch statement and a few lines of code. Browsers have issues/bugs that also need to be addressed. You are oversimplifying. > I've barely said a thing about it since. "The fastest, most concise, compatible and future-proof framework" 6 hours ago "Write Once, Do Nothing, Run Anywhere, Forever." Jan 18th "RIP jQuery, et al. Disco is Dead :) http://www.cinsoft.net/queries.html" Jan 3rd > LOL. Moved on to jQuery? Nope :D > Pardon me if I ignore the rest of your reports. :) Ignoring your bugs/failings won't make them go away. David, you have missed_the_mark more than a few times. 2 quick examples: API.setAttribute erases element event observers when name/type attributes are set in IE. API.addScript called in the HEAD element throws an `Operation Aborted` error in IE6 when a page has a BASE element > Any result that shows it as one of the "slowest" is clearly suspect. As mentioned earlier you have been testing old versions of frameworks and have delayed in updating to the most recent which is clearly suspect :D > I can tell you that without looking at any of your results (I've seen > all of the code). ;) Again, pretending your code is above reproach won't get you anywhere.
From: johncoltrane on 27 Jan 2010 17:20 For what it's worth, here are my results with a G5 Mac from 2004 : Specs : Mac OS X 10.5.8 / 1.8 GHz ppc G5 / 3 Gb RAM TaskSpeed @ http://scott.sauyet.com/Javascript/Test/taskspeed/2010-01-27a ---------------------+--------------+-------------+-------------- | Safari 4.0.4 | Opera 10.10 | Firefox 3.5.6 ---------------------+--------------+-------------+-------------- PureDom* | 1143 | 3153 | 1 1628 Dojo 1.4.0 | 3 761 | 3 2277 | 2654 jQuery 1.4.0 | 1934 | 5847 | 2793 MooTools 1.2.4 | 835 | 5809 | 4580 Prototype 1.6.0.3 | 1192 | 9485 | 5247 qooxdoo 0.8.2 | 2 666 | 2 1666 | 3 2190 YUI 2.7.0 | 1341 | 5322 | 3888 My Library (QSA Min) | 1 650 | 1 1435 | 2 2146 TaskSpeed @ http://www.cinsoft.net/taskspeed.html ---------------------+--------------+-------------+-------------- | Safari 4.0.4 | Opera 10.10 | Firefox 3.5.6 ---------------------+--------------+-------------+-------------- PureDom* | 1257 | 3918 | 1 3012 jQuery 1.2.6 | 5672 | 22390 | 17130 jQuery 1.3.2 | 3655 | 12422 | 14107 Prototype 1.6.0.3 | 1237 | 10553 | 10287 MooTools 1.2.2 | 1268 | 4792 | 7636 qooxdoo 0.8.2 | 3 1009 | 1 1941 | 2 3556 Dojo 1.3.2 | 1090 | 2 2358 | 4629 Dojo 1.4.0 | 2 962 | 3 2445 | 5354 YUI 2.7.0 | 1196 | 7962 | 6835 YUI 3.0 | 1215 | 2749 | 4465 My Library 1.0 | 1 581 | 5062 | 3 4315 What I see here : (on topic) My Library, Dojo and Qooxdoo are the fastest libs on this machine. jQuery and Prototype are the slowest on this machine. (off topic) I never liked Firefox on Mac. Now, I think I know why. -- (�l�)
From: David Mark on 27 Jan 2010 17:26 On Jan 27, 5:20 pm, johncoltrane <waternogeten...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > For what it's worth, here are my results with a G5 Mac from 2004 : > > Specs : Mac OS X 10.5.8 / 1.8 GHz ppc G5 / 3 Gb RAM Very nice. Thanks John! > > TaskSpeed @http://scott.sauyet.com/Javascript/Test/taskspeed/2010-01-27a > ---------------------+--------------+-------------+-------------- > | Safari 4.0.4 | Opera 10.10 | Firefox 3.5.6 > ---------------------+--------------+-------------+-------------- > PureDom* | 1143 | 3153 | 1 1628 > Dojo 1.4.0 | 3 761 | 3 2277 | 2654 > jQuery 1.4.0 | 1934 | 5847 | 2793 > MooTools 1.2.4 | 835 | 5809 | 4580 > Prototype 1.6.0.3 | 1192 | 9485 | 5247 > qooxdoo 0.8.2 | 2 666 | 2 1666 | 3 2190 > YUI 2.7.0 | 1341 | 5322 | 3888 > My Library (QSA Min) | 1 650 | 1 1435 | 2 2146 > > TaskSpeed @http://www.cinsoft.net/taskspeed.html > ---------------------+--------------+-------------+-------------- > | Safari 4.0.4 | Opera 10.10 | Firefox 3.5.6 > ---------------------+--------------+-------------+-------------- > PureDom* | 1257 | 3918 | 1 3012 > jQuery 1.2.6 | 5672 | 22390 | 17130 > jQuery 1.3.2 | 3655 | 12422 | 14107 > Prototype 1.6.0.3 | 1237 | 10553 | 10287 > MooTools 1.2.2 | 1268 | 4792 | 7636 > qooxdoo 0.8.2 | 3 1009 | 1 1941 | 2 3556 > Dojo 1.3.2 | 1090 | 2 2358 | 4629 > Dojo 1.4.0 | 2 962 | 3 2445 | 5354 > YUI 2.7.0 | 1196 | 7962 | 6835 > YUI 3.0 | 1215 | 2749 | 4465 > My Library 1.0 | 1 581 | 5062 | 3 4315 > > What I see here : > (on topic) > My Library, Dojo and Qooxdoo are the fastest libs on this machine. Looking under the hood, you will find that Dojo and Qooxdoo are cheating with browser sniffing. If you go back to older versions, you will find they fall flat on their face when confronted with IE8. That's not cross-browser scripting (just a fleeting illusion). Near as I can tell, they still don't get it (to this day!) You sure can't trust the UA string in IE8 (as if you could ever trust it anywhere). They have just run straight into a ten-year-old truth and are still reeling from the impact. ;) > jQuery and Prototype are the slowest on this machine. They always were. Looking under the hood shows why. ;) > (off topic) > I never liked Firefox on Mac. Now, I think I know why. > It's always been a lesser FF (a bit buggy too). Who would use FF when they have Safari built-in? ;)
From: RobG on 27 Jan 2010 19:53 On Jan 28, 3:09 am, David Mark <dmark.cins...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > TaskSpeed is another quasi-standard test that has never seen anything > like My Library. :) It was written by one of the Dojo guys. Yeah, I > know. :( > > http://www.cinsoft.net/mylib-testspeed.html > > It just flat-out murders the rest (even Dojo) Not on my machine - Windows XP, 3.3GHz P4. Here's the results for Firefox 3.5 and IE 6: Library Fx IE 6 PureDom* 794 3,031 jQuery 1.2.6 5,830 36,326 jQuery 1.3.2 3,763 11,826 Prototype 1.6.0.3 2,879 37,185 MooTools 1.2.2 2,306 20,358 qooxdoo 0.8.2 1,051 4,062 Dojo 1.3.2 1,218 9,110 Dojo 1.4.0 1,198 5,125 YUI 2.7.0 2,300 7,063 YUI 3.0 1,062 3,954 My Library 1.0 1,371 5,625 In Firefox My Library is beaten by YUI 3.0 and Dojo versions 1.4 and 1.3.2. In IE 6, it is beaten by YUI 3.0, Dojo 1.4 and qooxdoo. Prototype failed the insertAfter test in both Firefox and IE 6, > And yes, the test > functions are _very_ concise (even too concise). If "concise" means less code, then the library itself is 145KB, which is twice the size of YUI 3, though smaller than the monstorous qooxdoo. Perhaps the size can be optimised so that each libarary only contains the components required for the particular tests. The test code itself is not as concise as that for jQuery, and not much more concise than most of the others. Prototype and MooTools are perhaps the least concise, the total code for the "pure DOM" is 10KB. But the test code is tiny in comparison to the library itself, so not really a huge concern. -- Rob
From: Andrew Poulos on 27 Jan 2010 21:02
On 28/01/2010 11:53 AM, RobG wrote: > On Jan 28, 3:09 am, David Mark <dmark.cins...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> TaskSpeed is another quasi-standard test that has never seen anything >> like My Library. :) It was written by one of the Dojo guys. Yeah, I >> know. :( >> >> http://www.cinsoft.net/mylib-testspeed.html >> >> It just flat-out murders the rest (even Dojo) > > Not on my machine - Windows XP, 3.3GHz P4. Here's the results for > Firefox 3.5 and IE 6: > > Library Fx IE 6 > PureDom* 794 3,031 > jQuery 1.2.6 5,830 36,326 > jQuery 1.3.2 3,763 11,826 > Prototype 1.6.0.3 2,879 37,185 > MooTools 1.2.2 2,306 20,358 > qooxdoo 0.8.2 1,051 4,062 > Dojo 1.3.2 1,218 9,110 > Dojo 1.4.0 1,198 5,125 > YUI 2.7.0 2,300 7,063 > YUI 3.0 1,062 3,954 > My Library 1.0 1,371 5,625 My testing on MS Vista: Library Fx 3.6 IE 8 Op 10.10 Safari 4.04 PureDom 282 1,211 190 246 jQuery 1.2.6 1,692 6,269 1,904 1,188 jQuery 1.3.2 1,401 3,219 956 708 Prototype 1.6.0.3 889 3,790 830 385 MooTools 1.2.2 733 5,711 451 276 qooxdoo 0.8.2 405 1,383 180 208 Dojo 1.3.2 435 2,104 217 271 Dojo 1.4.0 448 1,771 266 245 YUI 2.7.0 788 2,370 517 286 YUI 3.0 440 1,531 252 255 My Library 1.0 448 1,757 222 168 I'm not sure how myLib can be faster than pure dom??? Andrew Poulos |