The Opposing Law
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: What is known about this Crothers?
Next: Research supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration finds first-order violation of local Lorentz invariance
From: jdawe on 3 Jan 2010 18:54 For each opposing operation are 2 opposing operands. Increasing an operand brings a corresponding decrease in its opposing operand. or Decreasing an operand brings a corresponding increase in its opposing operand. An operand can never be increased\decreased to the point where itself or its opposing operand becomes null. An operand is never the same as its opposing operand it is always the complete inverse. -Josh.
From: jdawe on 3 Jan 2010 19:03 On Jan 4, 10:54 am, jdawe <mrjd...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > For each opposing operation are 2 opposing operands. > > Increasing an operand brings a corresponding decrease in its opposing > operand. > > or > > Decreasing an operand brings a corresponding increase in its opposing > operand. > > An operand can never be increased\decreased to the point where itself > or its opposing operand becomes null. > > An operand is never the same as its opposing operand it is always the > complete inverse. > > -Josh. For example: Energy or Matter are opposing operands and are always together as an operation ( mass ). Every time a unit of energy in the mass is inverted into a unit of matter there is a corresponding decrease in energy of the mass and a corresponding increase in matter. or Every time a unit of matter in the mass is inverted into a unit of energy there is a corresponding decrease in matter of the mass and a corresponding increase in energy. The energy in the mass can never be inverted into matter to the point where there is null energy in the mass. or The matter in the mass can never be inverted into energy to the point where there is null matter in the mass. Finally, The energy in the mass is always energy it is never the same as matter. or The matter in the mass is always matter it is never the same as energy. -Josh.
From: Inertial on 3 Jan 2010 20:58 "jdawe" <mrjdawe(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:0be085c2-2b9c-4c3d-9377-286223e84994(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > For each opposing operation are 2 opposing operands. That makes no sense > Increasing an operand brings a corresponding decrease in its opposing > operand. > > or > > Decreasing an operand brings a corresponding increase in its opposing > operand. That makes no sense > An operand can never be increased\decreased to the point where itself > or its opposing operand becomes null. That makes no sense > An operand is never the same as its opposing operand it is always the > complete inverse. That makes no sense All in all, yours was just another post completely devoid of sense
From: Exploding Nipple Crank on 4 Jan 2010 01:07 Sorry, Mr. Google-posting fuckwit. You are not allowed to posting to this here newsgroups of mine unless you having a point or question. "jdawe" <mrjdawe(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:0be085c2-2b9c-4c3d-9377-286223e84994(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > increasing wha??
From: Ste on 4 Jan 2010 04:42
On 4 Jan, 01:58, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "jdawe" <mrjd...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:0be085c2-2b9c-4c3d-9377-286223e84994(a)b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com... > > > For each opposing operation are 2 opposing operands. > > That makes no sense > > > Increasing an operand brings a corresponding decrease in its opposing > > operand. > > > or > > > Decreasing an operand brings a corresponding increase in its opposing > > operand. > > That makes no sense > > > An operand can never be increased\decreased to the point where itself > > or its opposing operand becomes null. > > That makes no sense > > > An operand is never the same as its opposing operand it is always the > > complete inverse. > > That makes no sense > > All in all, yours was just another post completely devoid of sense Then you're aren't very intelligent Inertial. Any fool can see that what he is describing is an inverse relationship between two quantities, and further stating that while the balance between these quantities can grow very large, it can never become such that any value is absolutely nothing. Off the top of my head, this accurately describes the way a weighing- scale works - the only point at which one quantity can become zero, and the other infinite, is at the point where the weighting platforms are vertically separated, and that is the point at which the origin of the two quantities become indistinguishable from one another (i.e. one cannot tell merely from looking at the angle, on which side the weight was placed, and since the purpose of the scale is to compare the two quantities, the function of the scale breaks down because one cannot distinguish what was placed on the scale nor where it was placed). |