The true meaning of SpaceTime and God
in [Relativity]
|
Prev: Kip Thorne. Objects do not fall faster than light in a black hole
Next: Kip Thorne. Objects do not fall faster than light in a black hole
From: guskz on 4 Aug 2010 02:14 In Tensor terminology Time created all other vectors, thus dimensions. Meaning all other vectors (Space) are but a simulation. In the Ether-eal God terminology, through Time all dimensions (thus Space) flowed from the single point, which Science calls the singularity. In Electronic/Robotic terminology, all information (SPACE) emanated in the Past as in the Present from a single point, which Science calls the singularity. From an external perspective, outside "our" robot's perspective, SPACE (the Universe) presently still resides at the single point called the singularity. That external perspective (not the robot's perspective) would simply see a SINGLE point flashing light on & off "EXACTLY" like a MORSE ***code***. These flashes emanating from the single point's singularity are structured , with meaning, and an endlessly (Ether_nal) repetitive structure. This ***code*** contains all information, the size of the information, and thus the size of SPACE as well. The "strange" quark: #1. In a "strange" way, the flashes from the singularity, produce SPACE and a thus "also" location to store the previous flashes (thus SPACE is memory), so as to re-emanate these exact same flashes perpetually (Ether-nally). #2. Even "stranger" a single (sole) spirit (soul) [GOD] was born the day the flashes began from that single point, as a tiny dot of light in a dark tunnel (dark void) and that tiny dot also being the tiny eye "to" that spirit's soul; as when a baby is born and first opens his eye. That eye sees into it's own mind and created ALL things in it. #3. The Most "strange" is that Time, thus the time between the flashes emanating from the single point's singularity may from outside "our" robots perspective cease to exist, thus the Time would no longer flow like a river but instead would be perceived as a static picture? #4. The single soul (God head) through the flashes of information would have divided himself into multiple beings (same soul but not his memory) through a form of insulation, meaning some flashes are memories solely reserved for the God head, and subsequent flashes to the other beings, "us". ------------------ In layman's computer term, (where the computer is both the brain and the soul): The computer (the brain) is attached to the outside universe by one single wire. Splicing one cross-section of the wire, would be splicing one cross-section in time. That cross-section of wire represents the singularity. And instead of a wire, it would be a wireless antenna both transmitter & receiver emanating from the singularity. And through subdivisions in time (between the flashes of transmissions and the various frequencies of flashes), these transmissions would be for all senses of the soul including the motor ones and most importantly the MEMORY sense. Isolations of the memory would convert the original soul (GOD HEAD) into the multiple beings in this Ether- real's realm, "us". ------------------ For those experienced in radio communication: More plainly, you have a processor (the soul and brain) and through a single antenna (the singularity) and frequency alotation, it is linked to the memory chip, the motor actuators, the senses (speaker, monitor, joystick/mouse, microphone). The monitor in this case would also be the memory region where information is not only stored for display but also for retrieve.
From: Autymn D. C. on 4 Aug 2010 03:36 There are no singularities: Newton's, Coulomb's, and Yukawa's laws; Lense's/Thirring's, Ampère's, and Nambu's also. aerio := spiritus := breath pneýma := vis := wit psýkè := anima := soul it's -> its Time, room, and load always were; one did not beget the other. -Aut
From: Y.Porat on 4 Aug 2010 04:11 On Aug 4, 9:36 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > There are no singularities: Newton's, Coulomb's, and Yukawa's laws; > Lense's/Thirring's, Ampère's, and Nambu's also. > > aerio := spiritus := breath > pneýma := vis := wit > psýkè := anima := soul > > it's -> its > > Time, room, and load always were; one did not beget the other. > > -Aut -------------------- why dont you say loud and clear that your above 'Load' IS MASS!! and tell the people that NO MASS - THE ONLY MASS- NO REAL PHYSICS!! and just add a little remark under it about who claimed it first (:-) ATB Y.Porat -----------------------------
From: bert on 4 Aug 2010 13:08 On Aug 4, 2:14 am, "gu...(a)hotmail.com" <gu...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > In Tensor terminology Time created all other vectors, thus dimensions. > Meaning all other vectors (Space) are but a simulation. > > In the Ether-eal God terminology, through Time all dimensions (thus > Space) flowed from the single point, which Science calls the > singularity. > > In Electronic/Robotic terminology, all information (SPACE) emanated in > the Past as in the Present from a single point, which Science calls > the singularity. > > From an external perspective, outside "our" robot's perspective, SPACE > (the Universe) presently still resides at the single point called the > singularity. That external perspective (not the robot's perspective) > would simply see a SINGLE point flashing light on & off "EXACTLY" like > a MORSE ***code***. > > These flashes emanating from the single point's singularity are > structured , with meaning, and an endlessly (Ether_nal) repetitive > structure. This ***code*** contains all information, the size of the > information, and thus the size of SPACE as well. > > The "strange" quark: > > #1. In a "strange" way, the flashes from the singularity, produce > SPACE and a thus "also" location to store the previous flashes (thus > SPACE is memory), so as to re-emanate these exact same flashes > perpetually (Ether-nally). > > #2. Even "stranger" a single (sole) spirit (soul) [GOD] was born the > day the flashes began from that single point, as a tiny dot of light > in a dark tunnel (dark void) and that tiny dot also being the tiny eye > "to" that spirit's soul; as when a baby is born and first opens his > eye. That eye sees into it's own mind and created ALL things in it. > > #3. The Most "strange" is that Time, thus the time between the flashes > emanating from the single point's singularity may from outside "our" > robots perspective cease to exist, thus the Time would no longer flow > like a river but instead would be perceived as a static picture? > > #4. The single soul (God head) through the flashes of information > would have divided himself into multiple beings (same soul but not his > memory) through a form of insulation, meaning some flashes are > memories solely reserved for the God head, and subsequent flashes to > the other beings, "us". > > ------------------ > > In layman's computer term, (where the computer is both the brain and > the soul): > > The computer (the brain) is attached to the outside universe by one > single wire. Splicing one cross-section of the wire, would be splicing > one cross-section in time. > > That cross-section of wire represents the singularity. And instead of > a wire, it would be a wireless antenna both transmitter & receiver > emanating from the singularity. > > And through subdivisions in time (between the flashes of transmissions > and the various frequencies of flashes), these transmissions would be > for all senses of the soul including the motor ones and most > importantly the MEMORY sense. Isolations of the memory would convert > the original soul (GOD HEAD) into the multiple beings in this Ether- > real's realm, "us". > ------------------ > For those experienced in radio communication: > > More plainly, you have a processor (the soul and brain) and through a > single antenna (the singularity) and frequency alotation, it is > linked to the memory chip, the motor actuators, the senses (speaker, > monitor, joystick/mouse, microphone). The monitor in this case would > also be the memory region where information is not only stored for > display but also for retrieve. Einstein's "spacetime" gives events in the universe reality. Gods have nothing to do with reality since they are all Hocus pocus O ya TreBert
From: uri on 4 Aug 2010 13:55
It's extremely arrogant to say that God or things based on belief or faith have nothing to do with reality or are not real and that only things based on materialism and experimental evidence are real. The way I see it things based on faith or spirituality and all things having to do with the mind are no less real than things based on materialism, computationalism and experimentalism. It's also amazing how many people simply don't want there to be some kind of God but fact is that many people need a God because they are weak and helpless in this hostile world. |