Prev: Sunbelt Software and Malwarebytes Partner to Improve the Security of the Internet
Next: Security update hits Window PCs
From: Jenn on 22 Apr 2010 13:29
"PajaP" <pajap(a)news-only.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 02:02:06 -0400, "Peter Foldes" <okf22(a)hotmail.com>
>>Now you brilliantly showed your stupidity with that reply. JD's post flew
>>by you too
>>fast. You call yourself a woman with virtues and smarts. You just showed
>>opposite . How wonderful.
> Peter Foldes, is another friend of pcbuts's from the USA.
> Yes, you have proved it again.
The plot thickens ... lol
Jenn (from Oklahoma)
From: JD on 23 Apr 2010 09:23
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:21:47 -0500, JD<JD(a)example.invalid> wrote:
>> We do need to inform people of Butts but only when he replies to a new
>> question. And we do that by quickly telling the new person not to rely
>> on Butts. We can all tell when Butts is posting as someone else. Jest
>> say hi Chris, not today.
> The *regulars* have proved time and time again they cannot do this.
> They are not replying to warn people away from him. They are replying
> because they think their comment are somehow amusing and like Peter
> FOADs they feel the need for the last word.
> What was the point of these most recent comments?
> "You need to see a shrink ASAP"
> "Which woman are you tonight?"
> "How long do you think you can keep this up?"
> They really cannot resist pcbutts.
> He has them truly over a barrel.
> Especially Peter FOADs who he has bent over it, squealing like a pig.
Hi Chris, not today.