From: Jonathan N. Little on
Albert Ross wrote:

> HOWEVER
>
> it still uses tables for the thumbs, not that much of a problem IMO
> for what is tabular information

You can edit the thumbnail.html template to use what every you want. I
put each thumbnail in a floated DIV. Worked just fine. Linking the
stylesheet greatly increases flexibility and reduces the template code.

>
> BUT can you guys suggest a template that works in a similar way (light
> and fast and proper html/CSS) that would be a better thing to spend my
> time and energy on adapting?
>
> I can still use Irfanview to generate the thumbs and manually insert
> them into the code. I might even be able to insert the code into
> Irfanview and persuade it to generate a better site automagically.
>
> (Sorry about the file sizes, this is also a test for some
> photographers to look at)

I would suggest using the batch feature to rescale all your full size
images to a more consistent and rational size for the web, then from
those images make your webpages.

[high resolution originals folder]
V
batch to max 600 pixels high
V
[web images folder]
V
thumbnails to html function
V
[web ready pages]

--
Take care,

Jonathan
-------------------
LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
From: Chris F.A. Johnson on
On 2010-03-07, Albert Ross wrote:
....
> HOWEVER
>
> it still uses tables for the thumbs, not that much of a problem IMO
> for what is tabular information
>
> BUT can you guys suggest a template that works in a similar way (light
> and fast and proper html/CSS) that would be a better thing to spend my
> time and energy on adapting?

I wrote my own system using a couple of shell scripts and
ImageMagick to make the thumbs: http://photos.cfaj.ca/

--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfajohnson.com>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
Pro Bash Programming: Scripting the GNU/Linux Shell (2009, Apress)
From: Stan Brown on
Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:27:13 -0500 from Jonathan N. Little
<lws4art(a)gmail.com>:
> I would suggest using the batch feature to rescale all your full size
> images to a more consistent and rational size for the web, then from
> those images make your webpages.

The problem with such a mechanical approach is that pure resizing can
make dreadful thumbnails. What is often needed is cropping followed
by resizing.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/05/05/why_we_wont_help_you
From: dorayme on
In article <MPG.25fdf1943f18945898c042(a)news.individual.net>,
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown(a)fastmail.fm> wrote:

> Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:27:13 -0500 from Jonathan N. Little
> <lws4art(a)gmail.com>:
> > I would suggest using the batch feature to rescale all your full size
> > images to a more consistent and rational size for the web, then from
> > those images make your webpages.
>
> The problem with such a mechanical approach is that pure resizing can
> make dreadful thumbnails. What is often needed is cropping followed
> by resizing.

I guess sometimes large volume efficiency can trump your wise
strategy. Me, I don't do volume, I believe there are far too many
pictures in the world! <g>

Btw, I have just this minute finished a small page of thumbs. I
cropped with a set aspect so all *thumbnails* (not enlargements)
get to be same size and aspect. I resize all to the width I want
(this bit can be done by batch...)

The crop tool rectangles any area you want on the big picture
destined for enlargement - you drag it by its corner holding down
shift to keep aspect constant. The area chosen will be
undistorted and right for thumbnail. It does not always matter
that the aspect is not a true reflection of the enlargement,
better is that all the thumbs are same size and aspect and
relevant details shown. That they are all the same size makes for
easy float layout.

--
dorayme
From: Chris F.A. Johnson on
On 2010-03-07, Stan Brown wrote:
> Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:27:13 -0500 from Jonathan N. Little
><lws4art(a)gmail.com>:
>> I would suggest using the batch feature to rescale all your full size
>> images to a more consistent and rational size for the web, then from
>> those images make your webpages.
>
> The problem with such a mechanical approach is that pure resizing can
> make dreadful thumbnails. What is often needed is cropping followed
> by resizing.

That depends on the type of photograph. For many, the composition
of the whole shot is important, moreso than any particular detail.

I use a script to create all the thumbnails, but look over them and
use GIMP to improve (or redo) those that don't look good.


--
Chris F.A. Johnson <http://cfajohnson.com>
===================================================================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)
Pro Bash Programming: Scripting the GNU/Linux Shell (2009, Apress)