From: Johannes Berg on
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 12:53 +0800, wzt.wzt(a)gmail.com wrote:
> Make cfg80211_dev_rename() check sscanf return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhitong Wang <zhitong.wangzt(a)alibaba-inc.com>
>
> ---
> net/wireless/core.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/wireless/core.c b/net/wireless/core.c
> index 80afacd..8e815b4 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/core.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/core.c
> @@ -146,7 +146,9 @@ int cfg80211_dev_rename(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
> int idx, taken = -1, result, digits;
>
> /* prohibit calling the thing phy%d when %d is not its number */
> - sscanf(newname, PHY_NAME "%d%n", &idx, &taken);
> + if (sscanf(newname, PHY_NAME "%d%n", &idx, &taken) != 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +

Umm, no, your patch breaks it completely. Look at the logic again.

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/