From: "Daevid Vincent" on
http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.basic.php

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Harkness [mailto:david.h(a)highgearmedia.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:59 AM
> To: RQuadling(a)googlemail.com
> Cc: chris h; PHP-General
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Zend framework
>
> We use part of Zend MVC (the dispatcher, controllers, and
> view scripts) here
> and a lot of the other facilities such as the autoloader,
> config, etc. and
> are very happy so far. As long as you design your application
> with an eye
> toward portability, you won't be tied to ZF. For example, put
> all of your
> business logic in model classes instead of the controllers
> themselves. That
> way if you ever need to move to a new presentation layer or
> use the business
> logic outside it (e.g. in SOAP or RPC messages), you'll be ready.
>
> David
>

From: "Daevid Vincent" on
Sorry wrong thread. Damnit. I meant that link for the guy that didn't know
what the -> was for...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:daevid(a)daevid.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 12:01 PM
> To: 'David Harkness'
> Cc: 'PHP-General'
> Subject: RE: [PHP] Zend framework
>
> http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.basic.php
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Harkness [mailto:david.h(a)highgearmedia.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:59 AM
> > To: RQuadling(a)googlemail.com
> > Cc: chris h; PHP-General
> > Subject: Re: [PHP] Zend framework
> >
> > We use part of Zend MVC (the dispatcher, controllers, and
> > view scripts) here
> > and a lot of the other facilities such as the autoloader,
> > config, etc. and
> > are very happy so far. As long as you design your application
> > with an eye
> > toward portability, you won't be tied to ZF. For example, put
> > all of your
> > business logic in model classes instead of the controllers
> > themselves. That
> > way if you ever need to move to a new presentation layer or
> > use the business
> > logic outside it (e.g. in SOAP or RPC messages), you'll be ready.
> >
> > David
> >
>

From: chris h on
Thanks for the info everyone, this is pretty much what I was expecting to
hear about it. I think I'll probably stick to using it as a toolkit.



Thanks,
Chris.



On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Daevid Vincent <daevid(a)daevid.com> wrote:

> Sorry wrong thread. Damnit. I meant that link for the guy that didn't know
> what the -> was for...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daevid Vincent [mailto:daevid(a)daevid.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 12:01 PM
> > To: 'David Harkness'
> > Cc: 'PHP-General'
> > Subject: RE: [PHP] Zend framework
> >
> > http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.basic.php
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David Harkness [mailto:david.h(a)highgearmedia.com]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 10:59 AM
> > > To: RQuadling(a)googlemail.com
> > > Cc: chris h; PHP-General
> > > Subject: Re: [PHP] Zend framework
> > >
> > > We use part of Zend MVC (the dispatcher, controllers, and
> > > view scripts) here
> > > and a lot of the other facilities such as the autoloader,
> > > config, etc. and
> > > are very happy so far. As long as you design your application
> > > with an eye
> > > toward portability, you won't be tied to ZF. For example, put
> > > all of your
> > > business logic in model classes instead of the controllers
> > > themselves. That
> > > way if you ever need to move to a new presentation layer or
> > > use the business
> > > logic outside it (e.g. in SOAP or RPC messages), you'll be ready.
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>