accidently applied 926666 early...are we still ok?
in [Microsoft Exchange]
|
Prev: AQADMCLI.EXE
Next: question about moving mailboxes from 2000 exch to 2003 exchangeand mail store size
From: merizos on 5 Mar 2007 20:27 One of our admins accidently applied 926666 (the exchange DST patch) early. We have not done the OS or Client DST patches yet. Is it still OK for us to install client and server DST updates and then run our tzmove's? If not, should we uninstall 926666 (if it's even possible). -- Thanks so much
From: Bharat Suneja [MVP] on 5 Mar 2007 20:35 Yes, you can uninstall 926666. -- Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ---------------------------------------------- "merizos" <merizos(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:3AE63B3B-6708-4F75-B32D-2788BA90C465(a)microsoft.com... > One of our admins accidently applied 926666 (the exchange DST patch) > early. > We have not done the OS or Client DST patches yet. Is it still OK for us > to > install client and server DST updates and then run our tzmove's? > > If not, should we uninstall 926666 (if it's even possible). > > -- > Thanks so much
From: merizos on 5 Mar 2007 21:10 Should we uninstall or can we start installing server and client updates and leave 926666 on. The reason I ask is because I have about 30 outside sales guys who already updated their xp clients with DST patches -- Thanks so much "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote: > Yes, you can uninstall 926666. > -- > Bharat Suneja > MVP - Exchange > www.zenprise.com > NEW blog location: > exchangepedia.com/blog > ---------------------------------------------- > > > > "merizos" <merizos(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:3AE63B3B-6708-4F75-B32D-2788BA90C465(a)microsoft.com... > > One of our admins accidently applied 926666 (the exchange DST patch) > > early. > > We have not done the OS or Client DST patches yet. Is it still OK for us > > to > > install client and server DST updates and then run our tzmove's? > > > > If not, should we uninstall 926666 (if it's even possible). > > > > -- > > Thanks so much > > >
From: Bharat Suneja [MVP] on 5 Mar 2007 21:41 If you apply 926666 on Exchange before rebasing, under some circumstances recurring appointments created by OWA clients may not get rebased (or rebased correctly). I would recommend having users insert the meeting times in subject field of Calendar items during the affected extended DST period of March 11-April 1 and Oct. 28-Nov. 4, and/or having them print out their calendars before you start rebasing (or both). This will go a long way in resolving any conflicts or issues with items not getting rebased or getting rebased incorreclty. -- Bharat Suneja MVP - Exchange www.zenprise.com NEW blog location: exchangepedia.com/blog ---------------------------------------------- "merizos" <merizos(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:3D087CB7-8CEF-46ED-8026-B8F5EEDF7A89(a)microsoft.com... > Should we uninstall or can we start installing server and client updates > and > leave 926666 on. The reason I ask is because I have about 30 outside > sales > guys who already updated their xp clients with DST patches > -- > Thanks so much > > > "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote: > >> Yes, you can uninstall 926666. >> -- >> Bharat Suneja >> MVP - Exchange >> www.zenprise.com >> NEW blog location: >> exchangepedia.com/blog >> ---------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> "merizos" <merizos(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:3AE63B3B-6708-4F75-B32D-2788BA90C465(a)microsoft.com... >> > One of our admins accidently applied 926666 (the exchange DST patch) >> > early. >> > We have not done the OS or Client DST patches yet. Is it still OK for >> > us >> > to >> > install client and server DST updates and then run our tzmove's? >> > >> > If not, should we uninstall 926666 (if it's even possible). >> > >> > -- >> > Thanks so much >> >> >>
From: Curt Verwolf on 6 Mar 2007 00:51
You can uninstall 926666, rebase, and then reinstall 926666. "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" <bharatsuneja(a)no.spam.org> wrote in message news:%23Htr6j5XHHA.2636(a)TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > If you apply 926666 on Exchange before rebasing, under some circumstances > recurring appointments created by OWA clients may not get rebased (or > rebased correctly). > > I would recommend having users insert the meeting times in subject field > of Calendar items during the affected extended DST period of March > 11-April 1 and Oct. 28-Nov. 4, and/or having them print out their > calendars before you start rebasing (or both). This will go a long way in > resolving any conflicts or issues with items not getting rebased or > getting rebased incorreclty. > > -- > Bharat Suneja > MVP - Exchange > www.zenprise.com > NEW blog location: > exchangepedia.com/blog > ---------------------------------------------- > > > > "merizos" <merizos(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:3D087CB7-8CEF-46ED-8026-B8F5EEDF7A89(a)microsoft.com... >> Should we uninstall or can we start installing server and client updates >> and >> leave 926666 on. The reason I ask is because I have about 30 outside >> sales >> guys who already updated their xp clients with DST patches >> -- >> Thanks so much >> >> >> "Bharat Suneja [MVP]" wrote: >> >>> Yes, you can uninstall 926666. >>> -- >>> Bharat Suneja >>> MVP - Exchange >>> www.zenprise.com >>> NEW blog location: >>> exchangepedia.com/blog >>> ---------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> "merizos" <merizos(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >>> news:3AE63B3B-6708-4F75-B32D-2788BA90C465(a)microsoft.com... >>> > One of our admins accidently applied 926666 (the exchange DST patch) >>> > early. >>> > We have not done the OS or Client DST patches yet. Is it still OK >>> > for us >>> > to >>> > install client and server DST updates and then run our tzmove's? >>> > >>> > If not, should we uninstall 926666 (if it's even possible). >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Thanks so much >>> >>> >>> > > |