From: JR on 7 Jun 2010 21:23 I have an inspection table to keep track of rooms in various buildings. These rooms are shared with different supervisors. One inspection of a location would result in x # of inspection records. If the room was shared by 3 supervisors, the same inspection would generate 3 inspection records. Comment field on each record would be different according to the supervisor, were their employees following protocol, safety issues etc. Since there are so many fields, trying to pull unique values is difficult, so I made a new field in the query which concatenates SupervisorID, Bldg & Room to make a single unique value. This part is fine. I can pull unique Supervisor/location records with no problem. However, I only want the most recent inspection. I set the Totals part of the concatenated field to "Group By" and the rest to "First". Even though the dates are sorted as descending in the query, it pulls the First date from the original table, which by default is sorted ascending. So essentially I get the most outdated inspection, not the most recent. I've tried a two query approach. Make the first query, just sort the dates descending. Then make a new query based on the first, with the concatenated fields and so on. It gives the same result. I've tried putting my date field as the first column in the query. It gives the same result. How can I solve this date sorting issue?
From: JR on 7 Jun 2010 21:41 Of course 5 minutes after I post, I found a solution but I'm not sure how it works. Same query, except the for the date instead of First, I put Last and it works. I get the most recent inspection record per Supervisor/Room combo. Great. But when I look at my query results, Inspection ID = 2, but its date is not the same date Inspection ID = 2 is in the table. Inspection ID is pk for the table, autonumbered. Query result: InspectionID = 2, Name/Room = Smith 123, Date = January 6, 2010 Table row: InspectionID = 2, Name/Room = Smith 123, Date = June 6, 2009 So if i want to go back to see the details from that particular inspection (the most recent of Supervisor/Room), the Inspection ID is incorrect. Not quite gettin' it........ "JR" <iloveVBA(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:%232BNd$dBLHA.1888(a)TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >I have an inspection table to keep track of rooms in various buildings. >These rooms are shared with different supervisors. One inspection of a >location would result in x # of inspection records. If the room was shared >by 3 supervisors, the same inspection would generate 3 inspection records. >Comment field on each record would be different according to the >supervisor, were their employees following protocol, safety issues etc. > > Since there are so many fields, trying to pull unique values is difficult, > so I made a new field in the query which concatenates SupervisorID, Bldg & > Room to make a single unique value. This part is fine. > > I can pull unique Supervisor/location records with no problem. However, I > only want the most recent inspection. I set the Totals part of the > concatenated field to "Group By" and the rest to "First". Even though the > dates are sorted as descending in the query, it pulls the First date from > the original table, which by default is sorted ascending. So essentially I > get the most outdated inspection, not the most recent. > > I've tried a two query approach. Make the first query, just sort the dates > descending. Then make a new query based on the first, with the > concatenated fields and so on. It gives the same result. > > I've tried putting my date field as the first column in the query. It > gives the same result. > > How can I solve this date sorting issue? > > >
From: John W. Vinson on 6 Jun 2010 22:28 On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:23:45 -0400, "JR" <iloveVBA(a)gmail.com> wrote: >I have an inspection table to keep track of rooms in various buildings. >These rooms are shared with different supervisors. One inspection of a >location would result in x # of inspection records. If the room was shared >by 3 supervisors, the same inspection would generate 3 inspection records. >Comment field on each record would be different according to the supervisor, >were their employees following protocol, safety issues etc. > >Since there are so many fields, trying to pull unique values is difficult, >so I made a new field in the query which concatenates SupervisorID, Bldg & >Room to make a single unique value. This part is fine. Fine... but unnecessary. You can group by up to TEN fields; it is neither necessary nor particularly helpful to create a redundant concatenated field. >I can pull unique Supervisor/location records with no problem. However, I >only want the most recent inspection. I set the Totals part of the >concatenated field to "Group By" and the rest to "First". Even though the >dates are sorted as descending in the query, it pulls the First date from >the original table, which by default is sorted ascending. So essentially I >get the most outdated inspection, not the most recent. First is misleading. It returns the first record *in disk storage order* - essentially an arbitrary, meaningless record. A Subquery with a criterion such as =(SELECT Max([datefield]) FROM tablename AS X WHERE X.SupervisorID = tablename.SupervisorID) will be a better approach. >I've tried a two query approach. Make the first query, just sort the dates >descending. Then make a new query based on the first, with the concatenated >fields and so on. It gives the same result. Because of the same problem - FIRST isn't the "first" in the way you would think. -- John W. Vinson [MVP]
From: John W. Vinson on 6 Jun 2010 22:29 On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:41:24 -0400, "JR" <iloveVBA(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Same query, except the for the date instead of First, I put Last and it >works. sheer coincidence and good luck. Use the subquery instead. -- John W. Vinson [MVP]
From: JR on 7 Jun 2010 23:13 in the query view or sql view? "John W. Vinson" <jvinson(a)STOP_SPAM.WysardOfInfo.com> wrote in message news:4bmo06dietl01r3g02nm25rijo4a2jlhjj(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 21:41:24 -0400, "JR" <iloveVBA(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>Same query, except the for the date instead of First, I put Last and it >>works. > > sheer coincidence and good luck. Use the subquery instead. > -- > > John W. Vinson [MVP]
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Use of Parntheses in Expressions Next: How to set the parameter query for this case? |