Prev: Staging: batman-adv: fix checkpath.pl issues
Next: irq: Add CPU mask affinity hint callback framework
From: David Miller on 20 Apr 2010 22:20
From: Thomas Klein <osstklei(a)de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:08:11 +0200

> Reset a port's resources only if they're actually in an error state
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein <tklein(a)de.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Patch created against 2.6.34-rc4

There are several problems with these patches:

1) They are corrupted by your email client, lines unchanged
begin with one space character instead of two. Therefore
even 'patch' wouldn't accept these changes.

2) The double slash in the patch file paths make git not
accept the change. Please don't put double-slashes in
your patch paths as that canonically means "/".

3) These are not appropriate for net-2.6 as we are deep in
the -rcX series at this point and only the most diabolical
bug fixes are appropriate. Therefore, please generate these
against net-next-2.6, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Thomas Klein on 23 Apr 2010 04:30
On 04/22/2010 07:36 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Klein<tklein(a)de.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:10:55 +0200
>
>> Reset a port's resources only if they're actually in an error state
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein<tklein(a)de.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Patch created against net-2.6
>
> I thought you were sorry for wasting my time and that you were going
> to follow the directions I gave you last time, and I quote:
>
> --------------------
> 3) These are not appropriate for net-2.6 as we are deep in
> the -rcX series at this point and only the most diabolical
> bug fixes are appropriate. Therefore, please generate these
> against net-next-2.6, thanks.
> --------------------
>
> And here you are generating your patches against net-2.6. Heck, you
> even feel it's worth mentioning explicitly.

Guilty! Allows no excuse. Screwed it. Deeply sorry.

>
> Lucky for you the patches happen to apply cleanly to net-next-2.6 so
> I've put them there.

Thanks!
Thomas

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: David Miller on 22 Apr 2010 01:40
From: Thomas Klein <tklein(a)de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:10:55 +0200

> Reset a port's resources only if they're actually in an error state
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein <tklein(a)de.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Patch created against net-2.6

I thought you were sorry for wasting my time and that you were going
to follow the directions I gave you last time, and I quote:

--------------------
3) These are not appropriate for net-2.6 as we are deep in
the -rcX series at this point and only the most diabolical
bug fixes are appropriate. Therefore, please generate these
against net-next-2.6, thanks.
--------------------

And here you are generating your patches against net-2.6. Heck, you
even feel it's worth mentioning explicitly.

Lucky for you the patches happen to apply cleanly to net-next-2.6 so
I've put them there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Staging: batman-adv: fix checkpath.pl issues
Next: irq: Add CPU mask affinity hint callback framework