Prev: Safari (sigh)
Next: CFP International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: submissions until 28 May 2010
From: Ed Mullen on 16 Apr 2010 21:48
Stan Brown wrote:
> Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:32:45 -0400 from Ed Mullen<ed(a)edmullen.net>:
>> Isn't it "forebearers"?
>>
>
> No.
>

I think it is:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forebearer

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
For Sale: Parachute. Only used once, never opened, small stain.
From: Stan Brown on 17 Apr 2010 17:11
Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:48:29 -0400 from Ed Mullen <ed(a)edmullen.net>:
>
> Stan Brown wrote:
> > Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:32:45 -0400 from Ed Mullen<ed(a)edmullen.net>:
> >> Isn't it "forebearers"?
> >>
> >
> > No.
> >
>
> I think it is:
>
> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forebearer

It's wrong.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/05/05/why_we_wont_help_you
From: invalidmasonc on 17 Apr 2010 19:46
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:11:15 -0400, Stan Brown <the_stan_brown(a)fastmail.fm> wrote:

>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:48:29 -0400 from Ed Mullen <ed(a)edmullen.net>:
>>
>> Stan Brown wrote:
>> > Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:32:45 -0400 from Ed Mullen<ed(a)edmullen.net>:
>> >> Isn't it "forebearers"?
>> >>
>> >
>> > No.
>> >
>>
>> I think it is:
>>
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forebearer
>
>It's wrong.

Stop being perverted.
The subject of the thread is: <h2> inside a link needs <object> is this ok?

HA !
From: dorayme on 17 Apr 2010 19:51
In article <jmgks5tar417nkfhvq3tlqmu80dr70160j(a)4ax.com>,
invalidmasonc(a)invalid.invalid wrote:

Please change your email address to start with "mason". This is
really crazy! You have let yourself be unnecessarily spooked. You
seem not to believe me when I told you that JK was not giving you
information and advice but merely and lovingly showing his
disapproval. There is nothing you are likely to be able to do to
alter this so at least don't do unnatural things in response.

--
dorayme
From: masonc on 18 Apr 2010 02:19
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 09:51:28 +1000, dorayme <dorayme(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote:

>In article <jmgks5tar417nkfhvq3tlqmu80dr70160j(a)4ax.com>,
> invalidmasonc(a)invalid.invalid wrote:
>
>Please change your email address to start with "mason". This is
>really crazy! You have let yourself be unnecessarily spooked. You
>seem not to believe me when I told you that JK was not giving you
>information and advice but merely and lovingly showing his
>disapproval. There is nothing you are likely to be able to do to
>alter this so at least don't do unnatural things in response.

What doreyme wants, doreyme gets.

JK's "loving disapproval" is welcomed. Children should be coddled.

MasonC
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Safari (sigh)
Next: CFP International Conference WWW/Internet 2010: submissions until 28 May 2010