From: David Mark on 20 Jan 2010 12:54
On Jan 20, 12:47 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 20, 9:58 am, David Mark <dmark.cins...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 18, 3:39 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> That doesn't indicate anything wrong with the library any more than
> >> any lint program indicates problems with its target environment.
> > Of course, you don't need a lint to see what is wrong with the
> > library.
> As said, the post was definitely flamebait! :-)
Yes, truth in labeling here.
> > It's as obviously unsuitable as a dissertation written in crayon.
> I met someone who did that. Literally. Or so she claimed. Of course
> her paper was on how to creatively integrate art education into pre-
> school and Kindergarten programs. It was filled with many colorful
> illustrations. Her adviser loved it, and so did most of the
> committee. But she did eventually have to submit a more formal
> version. So much for creativity!
It has its place.