From: Andrew Morton on
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:17:09 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu> wrote:

> ( Andrew, this patch has mm/* effects - any objections? Would still like
> to get this into v2.6.32. )

I queued this a week ago, along with
perf-allocate-mmap-buffer-using-vmalloc_user.patch.

If the latter gets quitably acked I can merge it, otherwise I'll spray
it at you guys.

Merging
mm-make-vmalloc_user-align-base-kernel-virtual-address-to-shmlba.patch
via another tree will cause a teeny reject at my end, not a problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Peter Zijlstra on
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 10:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:17:09 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo(a)elte.hu> wrote:
>
> > ( Andrew, this patch has mm/* effects - any objections? Would still like
> > to get this into v2.6.32. )
>
> I queued this a week ago, along with
> perf-allocate-mmap-buffer-using-vmalloc_user.patch.
>
> If the latter gets quitably acked I can merge it, otherwise I'll spray
> it at you guys.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra(a)chello.nl>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/