From: Axel Lin on
2010/8/9 Liam Girdwood <lrg(a)slimlogic.co.uk>:
> On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 08:09 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
>> We already check count value before calling i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(),
>> no need to check it again.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin(a)gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>> ---
>> This resend adds regulator: prefix in the subject line.
>>
>> �drivers/regulator/lp3971.c | � �2 +-
>> �1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/lp3971.c b/drivers/regulator/lp3971.c
>> index d4d9822..3bb82b6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/regulator/lp3971.c
>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/lp3971.c
>> @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static int lp3971_i2c_read(struct i2c_client *i2c, char reg, int count,
>> � � � if (count != 1)
>> � � � � � � � return -EIO;
>> � � � ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(i2c, reg);
>> - � � if (ret < 0 || count != 1)
>> + � � if (ret < 0)
>> � � � � � � � return -EIO;
>>
>> � � � *dest = ret;
>
> Applied 1/2 only as 2/2 is the same patch.
Ooops. My bad. I copied the same patch for patch 1/2 and 1/2.
I'll resend it now.
patch tiltle: [PATCH RESEND again] regulator: lp3971 - remove
unnecessary ret value checking in lp3971_i2c_write()

Regards,
Axel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/