From: grant little on
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:57 AM, cjay <cjay(a)engr.colostate.edu> wrote:

> Running Samba 3.4.5 on Solaris 10 Sparc platform. I can't seem to get rid
> of the following errors:
>
> log.b104d1:rlimit_max: rlimit_max (10020) below minimum Windows limit
> (16384)
>
> I've tried adding "ulimit -n 16384" to the samba start scripts, but still
> getting these errors. Anyone know what I should do about this. Could these
> errors cause slowness to the samba share for clients?
>
>
>
> --
> C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist(a)colostate.edu
> UNIX/Network Manager Phone: 970-491-0630
> Engineering Network Services Fax: 970-491-5569
> College of Engineering, CSU
> Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301
>
>
> Don't know if it will help but that is mentioned here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-January/153320.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Jeremy Allison on
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:57:02AM -0700, cjay wrote:
> Running Samba 3.4.5 on Solaris 10 Sparc platform. I can't seem to
> get rid of the following errors:
>
> log.b104d1:rlimit_max: rlimit_max (10020) below minimum Windows
> limit (16384)
>
> I've tried adding "ulimit -n 16384" to the samba start scripts, but
> still getting these errors. Anyone know what I should do about
> this. Could these errors cause slowness to the samba share for
> clients?

No. It's informational only.

Jeremy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Miguel Medalha on

>> Running Samba 3.4.5 on Solaris 10 Sparc platform. I can't seem to get rid
>> of the following errors:
>>
>> log.b104d1:rlimit_max: rlimit_max (10020) below minimum Windows limit
>> (16384)
>>
>> I've tried adding "ulimit -n 16384" to the samba start scripts, but still
>> getting these errors. Anyone know what I should do about this. Could these
>> errors cause slowness to the samba share for clients?
>>
>

I got rid of the error by making the necessary change permanent. I
entered the following line in "/etc/security/limits.conf":

* - nofile 16384

The warning previously given by "testparm" is now gone.

From "limits.conf"'s header:

«Quote:

- the wildcard *, for default entry
- nofile - max number of open files

End of quote»

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: CJ Keist on
This is for Linux right? Solaris doesn't have limits.conf file. In
Solaris such kernel parameters are put in /etc/system file. Just have
to find the right kernel parameter to adjust.



On 2/21/10 3:09 PM, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
>>> Running Samba 3.4.5 on Solaris 10 Sparc platform. I can't seem to
>>> get rid
>>> of the following errors:
>>>
>>> log.b104d1:rlimit_max: rlimit_max (10020) below minimum Windows limit
>>> (16384)
>>>
>>> I've tried adding "ulimit -n 16384" to the samba start scripts, but
>>> still
>>> getting these errors. Anyone know what I should do about this.
>>> Could these
>>> errors cause slowness to the samba share for clients?
>>
>
> I got rid of the error by making the necessary change permanent. I
> entered the following line in "/etc/security/limits.conf":
>
> * - nofile 16384
>
> The warning previously given by "testparm" is now gone.
>
> From "limits.conf"'s header:
>
> «Quote:
>
> - the wildcard *, for default entry
> - nofile - max number of open files
>
> End of quote»
>

--
C. J. Keist Email: cj.keist(a)colostate.edu
UNIX/Network Manager Phone: 970-491-0630
Engineering Network Services Fax: 970-491-5569
College of Engineering, CSU
Ft. Collins, CO 80523-1301

All I want is a chance to prove 'Money can't buy happiness'

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba