From: Volker Lendecke on
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:37:28AM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
> linw opened file mail/bind read=Yes write=No (numopen=3)
> [2010/02/06 03:23:41, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:1970(call_nt_transact_ioctl)
> FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes
> needed!
> [2010/02/06 03:23:57, 2] smbd/close.c:612(close_normal_file)
> linw closed file mail/bind (numopen=2) NT_STATUS_OK
>
> Is the max data count too small the problem? Is there a bug in this
> version of samba? Is this relevant?
>
> Or is there something else wrong I don't see?
>
> linux 2.6.27.29 on suse 11.1
> samba 3.4.3-12.1

Looks like samba bug 6850, fixed in 3.4.4.

Volker
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Linda Walsh on
Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:37:28AM -0800, Linda Walsh wrote:
>> linw opened file mail/bind read=Yes write=No (numopen=3)
>> [2010/02/06 03:23:41, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:1970(call_nt_transact_ioctl)
>> FSCTL_GET_SHADOW_COPY_DATA: max_data_count(114) too small (118) bytes
>> needed!
>> [2010/02/06 03:23:57, 2] smbd/close.c:612(close_normal_file)
>> linw closed file mail/bind (numopen=2) NT_STATUS_OK
>>
>> Is the max data count too small the problem? Is there a bug in this
>> version of samba? Is this relevant?
>>
>> Or is there something else wrong I don't see?
>>
>> linux 2.6.27.29 on suse 11.1
>> samba 3.4.3-12.1
>
> Looks like samba bug 6850, fixed in 3.4.4.
>
> Volker
----
Bingo!

Thanks!
We got previous versions!

Yeay!

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba